How to prioritize species recovery after a megafire

© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 36(2022), 5 vom: 18. Okt., Seite e13936
1. Verfasser: Ward, Michelle (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Carwardine, Josie, Watson, James E M, Pintor, Anna, Stuart, Stephanie, Possingham, Hugh P, Rhodes, Jonathan R, Carey, Alexander R, Auerbach, Nancy, Reside, April, Yong, Chuan Ji, Tulloch, Ayesha I T
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Australia acciones actions bushfire impacts cambio climático climate change conservación conservation mehr... fire impacto de los incendios incendios 丛林火灾影响 保护 气候变化 澳大利亚 火灾 行动
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM340840315
003 DE-627
005 20231226010404.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13936  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1136.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM340840315 
035 |a (NLM)35561069 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ward, Michelle  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How to prioritize species recovery after a megafire 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 03.10.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 04.01.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Due to climate change, megafires are increasingly common and have sudden, extensive impacts on many species over vast areas, leaving decision makers uncertain about how best to prioritize recovery. We devised a decision-support framework to prioritize conservation actions to improve species outcomes immediately after a megafire. Complementary locations are selected to extend recovery actions across all fire-affected species' habitats. We applied our method to areas burned in the 2019-2020 Australian megafires and assessed its conservation advantages by comparing our results with outcomes of a site-richness approach (i.e., identifying areas that cost-effectively recover the most species in any one location). We found that 290 threatened species were likely severely affected and will require immediate conservation action to prevent population declines and possible extirpation. We identified 179 subregions, mostly in southeastern Australia, that are key locations to extend actions that benefit multiple species. Cost savings were over AU$300 million to reduce 95% of threats across all species. Our complementarity-based prioritization also spread postfire management actions across a wider proportion of the study area compared with the site-richness method (43% vs. 37% of the landscape managed, respectively) and put more of each species' range under management (average 90% vs. 79% of every species' habitat managed). In addition to wildfire response, our framework can be used to prioritize conservation actions that will best mitigate threats affecting species following other extreme environmental events (e.g., floods and drought) 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Australia 
650 4 |a acciones 
650 4 |a actions 
650 4 |a bushfire impacts 
650 4 |a cambio climático 
650 4 |a climate change 
650 4 |a conservación 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a fire 
650 4 |a impacto de los incendios 
650 4 |a incendios 
650 4 |a 丛林火灾影响 
650 4 |a 保护 
650 4 |a 气候变化 
650 4 |a 澳大利亚 
650 4 |a 火灾 
650 4 |a 行动 
700 1 |a Carwardine, Josie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Watson, James E M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pintor, Anna  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stuart, Stephanie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Possingham, Hugh P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rhodes, Jonathan R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Carey, Alexander R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Auerbach, Nancy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reside, April  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yong, Chuan Ji  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tulloch, Ayesha I T  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 36(2022), 5 vom: 18. Okt., Seite e13936  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:5  |g day:18  |g month:10  |g pages:e13936 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13936  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 36  |j 2022  |e 5  |b 18  |c 10  |h e13936