Design of gas collection systems : Issues and challenges

The design of a gas collection system (GCS) for a landfill involves estimating several critical parameters, such as the radius of influence (ROI), suction pressures, number of wells and their spacing. One of the biggest challenges lies in the estimation of ROI for a particular landfill. In this stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA. - 1991. - 40(2022), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 1608-1617
1. Verfasser: Parameswaran, T G (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Sivakumar Babu, G L
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
Schlagworte:Journal Article Atmospheric methane flux Bagalur landfill gas collection systems gas recovery rate radius of influence Air Pollutants Methane OP0UW79H66
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The design of a gas collection system (GCS) for a landfill involves estimating several critical parameters, such as the radius of influence (ROI), suction pressures, number of wells and their spacing. One of the biggest challenges lies in the estimation of ROI for a particular landfill. In this study, the ROI for a Bagalur landfill is estimated for various possible gas generation rates. ROI for active and passive GCS is estimated with numerical modelling (two-dimensional) for all definitions of ROI at different suction pressures. An inverse correlation was observed between the values of various definitions of ROI at different gas generation rates. Justification for this behaviour is brought out by addressing the conceptual difference between these definitions. The number of wells along with their spacing was then calculated, and the efficiency of the design was assessed with three-dimensional modelling. Passive and active systems had average methane recovery rates of 84% and 88%, respectively, with an atmospheric methane flux ranging from 10-9 to 10-10 kg m-2 s-1. The high recovery rate and low methane flux indicate the effectiveness of the design. The values of the methane flow rate from the extraction well were validated with a theoretical method, suggesting the usability of the model for future investigations
Beschreibung:Date Completed 18.10.2022
Date Revised 18.10.2022
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1096-3669
DOI:10.1177/0734242X221086949