Evaluation of Gas Adsorption in Nanoporous Shale by Simplified Local Density Model Integrated with Pore Structure and Pore Size Distribution

Simplified local density (SLD) model has been widely used to describe the gas adsorption behaviors in porous media. However, the slit pore geometry and constant pore width associated with the SLD model may fail to represent the heterogeneous pore network structure in shale. In this study, a new meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. - 1992. - 38(2022), 12 vom: 29. März, Seite 3641-3655
1. Verfasser: Pang, Yu (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Wang, Sen, Yao, Xinyu, Hu, Xiaofei, Chen, Shengnan
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM338282726
003 DE-627
005 20231226000325.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02408  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1127.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM338282726 
035 |a (NLM)35297628 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Pang, Yu  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of Gas Adsorption in Nanoporous Shale by Simplified Local Density Model Integrated with Pore Structure and Pore Size Distribution 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 29.03.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a Simplified local density (SLD) model has been widely used to describe the gas adsorption behaviors in porous media. However, the slit pore geometry and constant pore width associated with the SLD model may fail to represent the heterogeneous pore network structure in shale. In this study, a new method to integrate the SLD model with the slit and cylindrical pore structures as well as the pore size distribution (PSD) is proposed and validated by the grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and the experimentally measured adsorption of methane on shale with complex pore network. Comparison results show that reasonably good agreement is achieved between the SLD model and GCMC simulations for both the gas adsorption isotherms and discrete-density profiles in multiwalled carbon nanoslit and nanotube. The corresponding average absolute percentage deviations (% AADs) are below 0.3 and 9.3 for gas adsorption isotherm and discrete-density profile, respectively. In addition, the SLD model coupled with the PSD of slit and cylindrical pores ranging from micro- to macropores properly characterizes the measured excess adsorption of methane on Wolfcamp shale core sample with % AADs between 1.7 and 3.6. It is found that when the pore volume is fixed, the gas adsorption isotherm and gas density profile are heavily dependent on the pore geometry and pore size. Furthermore, integrating the PSD into the SLD model can guarantee the valid identification of the adsorbed- and free-gas regions in flow channels with different sizes based on the gas density profiles. The findings of this study shed light on the effects of pore structure on gas adsorption in nanopores and enable us to precisely evaluate and predict the gas adsorption behaviors in slit and cylindrical pores over a wide range of pore sizes 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Wang, Sen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yao, Xinyu  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hu, Xiaofei  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chen, Shengnan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids  |d 1992  |g 38(2022), 12 vom: 29. März, Seite 3641-3655  |w (DE-627)NLM098181009  |x 1520-5827  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2022  |g number:12  |g day:29  |g month:03  |g pages:3641-3655 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02408  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_721 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 38  |j 2022  |e 12  |b 29  |c 03  |h 3641-3655