|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM336739362 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231225232826.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1122.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM336739362
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)35141693
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a DeBernardis, Dennis A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Midterm outcomes and survivorship of arthroscopic elbow debridement
|b a comparison of posttraumatic versus primary degenerative osteoarthritis
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2022
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 01.05.2022
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Electronic-eCollection
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2021 The Author(s).
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic debridement is an effective means of surgical management of both degenerative osteoarthritis (DOA) and posttraumatic arthritis (PTA) of the elbow. However, the difference in the efficacy and longevity of this procedure when performed for these two distinct pathologies remains in question. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the midterm outcomes and survivorship of arthroscopic debridement of elbow PTA and DOA
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing arthroscopic debridement of DOA and PTA of the elbow was performed. A questionnaire containing the Oxford Elbow Score, as well as questions regarding the incidence of reoperation, additional nonoperative intervention, complications, pain, and satisfaction, was given at 5 years, minimum, after surgery. The midterm survivorship of arthroscopic debridement free of reoperation for any reason, as well as the remaining outcome measurements obtained via the questionnaire and in-office evaluation, was compared between PTA and DOA cohorts
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a RESULTS: Eighty patients (DOA = 36, PTA = 44) were included in this study for analysis. All 36 patients with DOA were noted to be male. Follow-up time at the date of questionnaire response was 7.9 years (range, 5.6-11.8) in the DOA cohort and 8.6 years (range, 5.7-12.7) in the PTA cohort. Reoperation rates of 5.6% and 11.4% were identified in the DOA and PTA cohorts, respectively. No statistical difference was noted in reoperation rate, survivorship, or any measured patient-reported outcomes between cohorts at the final follow-up visit. Both cohorts demonstrated a significant improvement in Visual Analog Scale pain scores (P < .001) and ROM. Postoperative ROM was obtained at the final clinic visit at an average follow-up duration of 151 days and 255 days in the DOA and PTA cohorts, respectively. However, no difference in the degree of improvement in either outcome variable was identified after a comparison between cohorts
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic debridement is an equally efficacious treatment option for DOA and PTA of the elbow. Patients with either pathology can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Arthroscopy
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Débridement
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Elbow
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Osteoarthritis
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Reoperation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Survivorship
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Santoro, Adam J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Minissale, Nicholas J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Kirsch, Jacob M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Cheesman, Quincy T
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Alberta, Frank G
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Austin, Luke S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t JSES international
|d 2020
|g 6(2022), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 175-181
|w (DE-627)NLM307818438
|x 2666-6383
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:6
|g year:2022
|g number:1
|g day:18
|g month:01
|g pages:175-181
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_50
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 6
|j 2022
|e 1
|b 18
|c 01
|h 175-181
|