Mid- to long-term results of postoperative immobilization in internal vs. external rotation after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization

© 2021 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 5(2021), 6 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 960-966
1. Verfasser: Minkus, Marvin (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Wolke, Julia, Akgün, Doruk, Scheibel, Markus
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization Shoulder immobilization in external rotation Shoulder immobilization in internal rotation Shoulder instability
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM333039661
003 DE-627
005 20231225220822.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.004  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1110.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM333039661 
035 |a (NLM)34766070 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Minkus, Marvin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Mid- to long-term results of postoperative immobilization in internal vs. external rotation after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 28.04.2022 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 The Author(s). 
520 |a BACKGROUND: There is still a disagreement on the postoperative rehabilitation concerning position of immobilization of the shoulder after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization and its influence on the clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results and the recurrence rate after arthroscopic anteroinferior shoulder stabilization and postoperative immobilization in internal rotation vs. external rotation 
520 |a METHODS: Twenty-five patients (22 male and 3 female, mean age 28.5 years) were included in this prospective nonrandomized cohort study. In group I (11 male, 2 female, mean age 28 years), the postoperative functional immobilization was carried out in internal rotation of 60°, and in group II (11 male, 1 female, mean age 30 years), 15° of external rotation of the arm for 4 weeks in both groups. The clinical follow-up was performed at 2, 4, and 6 weeks as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively including assessment of range of motion and functional shoulder scores (Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score, Rowe score, Walch Duplay score, Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score). Furthermore, shoulder instability was evaluated using the apprehension, relocation, and surprise tests. Mid-term follow-up data were additionally assessed after a minimum of 4 years 
520 |a RESULTS: Twenty patients (19 male and 1 female) with an average age of 28 years were followed up for 62 (53-72) months after arthroscopic stabilization. The comparison of both groups showed almost equal results regarding the range of motion without any significant differences (P > .05). The evaluation of the shoulder function scores also showed no significant differences with an average Subjective Shoulder Value of 95% vs. 91%, Constant score of 89 vs. 88 points, Rowe score of 96 vs. 94 points, Walch Duplay score of 86 vs. 89 points, Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score of 96 points, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of 88% vs. 84% (P > .05). There was no recurrent dislocation in both groups 
520 |a CONCLUSION: The type of immobilization after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization does not influence the clinical results after a mid- to long-term follow-up 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization 
650 4 |a Shoulder immobilization in external rotation 
650 4 |a Shoulder immobilization in internal rotation 
650 4 |a Shoulder instability 
700 1 |a Wolke, Julia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Akgün, Doruk  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Scheibel, Markus  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 5(2021), 6 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 960-966  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2021  |g number:6  |g day:17  |g month:11  |g pages:960-966 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.004  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 5  |j 2021  |e 6  |b 17  |c 11  |h 960-966