Disparities among crop species in the evolution of growth rates : the role of distinct origins and domestication histories

© 2021 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 233(2022), 2 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 995-1010
1. Verfasser: Gómez-Fernández, Alicia (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Osborne, Colin P, Rees, Mark, Palomino, Javier, Ingala, Carlos, Gómez, Guillermo, Milla, Rubén
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Triticum turgidum domestication functional groups leaf mass ratio net assimilation rate relative growth rate specific leaf area wild progenitors
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM332649938
003 DE-627
005 20231225220012.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.17840  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1108.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM332649938 
035 |a (NLM)34726792 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Gómez-Fernández, Alicia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Disparities among crop species in the evolution of growth rates  |b the role of distinct origins and domestication histories 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 24.03.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 24.03.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16818046.v2 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation. 
520 |a Growth rates vary widely among plants with different strategies. For crops, evolution under predictable and high-resource environments might favour rapid resource acquisition and growth, but whether this strategy has consistently evolved during domestication and improvement remains unclear. Here we report a comprehensive study of the evolution of growth rates based on comparisons among wild, landrace, and improved accessions of 19 herbaceous crops grown under common conditions. We also examined the underlying growth components and the influence of crop origin and history on growth evolution. Domestication and improvement did not affect growth consistently, that is growth rates increased or decreased or remained unchanged in different crops. Crops selected for fruits increased the physiological component of growth (net assimilation rate), whereas leaf and seed crops showed larger domestication effects on morphology (leaf mass ratio and specific leaf area). Moreover, climate and phylogeny contributed to explaining the effects of domestication and changes in growth. Crop-specific responses to domestication and improvement suggest that selection for high yield has not consistently changed growth rates. The trade-offs between morpho-physiological traits and the distinct origins and histories of crops accounted for the variability in growth changes. These findings have far-reaching implications for our understanding of crop performance and adaptation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Triticum turgidum 
650 4 |a domestication 
650 4 |a functional groups 
650 4 |a leaf mass ratio 
650 4 |a net assimilation rate 
650 4 |a relative growth rate 
650 4 |a specific leaf area 
650 4 |a wild progenitors 
700 1 |a Osborne, Colin P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rees, Mark  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Palomino, Javier  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ingala, Carlos  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gómez, Guillermo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Milla, Rubén  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1979  |g 233(2022), 2 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 995-1010  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:233  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g day:15  |g month:01  |g pages:995-1010 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17840  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 233  |j 2022  |e 2  |b 15  |c 01  |h 995-1010