Responses of soil pH to no-till and the factors affecting it : A global meta-analysis

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology. - 1999. - 28(2022), 1 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 154-166
1. Verfasser: Zhao, Xin (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: He, Cong, Liu, Wen-Sheng, Liu, Wen-Xuan, Liu, Qiu-Yue, Bai, Wei, Li, Li-Jun, Lal, Rattan, Zhang, Hai-Lin
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Global change biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Meta-Analysis driver and consequence global meta-analysis no-till soil acidification soil pH Fertilizers Soil
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM331920964
003 DE-627
005 20231225214532.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/gcb.15930  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1106.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM331920964 
035 |a (NLM)34651373 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Zhao, Xin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Responses of soil pH to no-till and the factors affecting it  |b A global meta-analysis 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 03.01.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 03.01.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
520 |a No-till (NT) is a sustainable option because of its benefits in controlling erosion, saving labor, and mitigating climate change. However, a comprehensive assessment of soil pH response to NT is still lacking. Thus, a global meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of NT on soil pH and to identify the influential factors and possible consequences based on the analysis of 114 publications. When comparing tillage practices, the results indicated an overall significant decrease by 1.33 ± 0.28% in soil pH under NT than that under conventional tillage (p < .05). Soil texture, NT duration, mean annual temperature (MAT), and initial soil pH are the critical factors affecting soil pH under NT. Specifically, with significant variations among subgroups, when compared to conventional tillage, the soil under NT had lower relative changes in soil pH observed on clay loam soil (-2.44%), long-term implementation (-2.11% for more than 15 years), medium MAT (-1.87% in the range of 8-16℃), neutral soil pH (-2.28% for 6.5 < initial soil pH < 7.5), mean annual precipitation (-1.95% in the range of 600-1200 mm), in topsoil layers (-2.03% for 0-20 cm), with crop rotation (-1.98%), N fertilizer input (the same for NT and conventional tillage) of 100-200 kg N ha-1 (-1.83%), or crop residue retention (-1.52%). Changes in organic matter decomposition under undisturbed soil and with crop residue retention might lead to a higher concentration of H+ and lower of basic cations (i.e., calcium, magnesium, and potassium), which decrease the soil pH, and consequently, impact nutrient dynamics (i.e., soil phosphorus) in the surface layer under NT. Furthermore, soil acidification may be aggravated by NT within site-specific conditions and improper fertilizer and crop residue management and consequently leading to adverse effects on soil nutrient availability. Thus, there is a need to identify strategies to ameliorate soil acidification under NT to minimize the adverse consequences 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Meta-Analysis 
650 4 |a driver and consequence 
650 4 |a global meta-analysis 
650 4 |a no-till 
650 4 |a soil acidification 
650 4 |a soil pH 
650 7 |a Fertilizers  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Soil  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a He, Cong  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Wen-Sheng  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Wen-Xuan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Qiu-Yue  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bai, Wei  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Li, Li-Jun  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lal, Rattan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zhang, Hai-Lin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Global change biology  |d 1999  |g 28(2022), 1 vom: 09. Jan., Seite 154-166  |w (DE-627)NLM098239996  |x 1365-2486  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g day:09  |g month:01  |g pages:154-166 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15930  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 28  |j 2022  |e 1  |b 09  |c 01  |h 154-166