LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM330193287
003 DE-627
005 20231225210747.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13835  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1100.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM330193287 
035 |a (NLM)34476839 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Roche, Dominique G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Closing the knowledge-action gap in conservation with open science 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 30.05.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 22.07.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a The knowledge-action gap in conservation science and practice occurs when research outputs do not result in actions to protect or restore biodiversity. Among the diverse and complex reasons for this gap, three barriers are fundamental: knowledge is often unavailable to practitioners and challenging to interpret or difficult to use or both. Problems of availability, interpretability, and useability are solvable with open science practices. We considered the benefits and challenges of three open science practices for use by conservation scientists and practitioners. First, open access publishing makes the scientific literature available to all. Second, open materials (detailed methods, data, code, and software) increase the transparency and use of research findings. Third, open education resources allow conservation scientists and practitioners to acquire the skills needed to use research outputs. The long-term adoption of open science practices would help researchers and practitioners achieve conservation goals more quickly and efficiently and reduce inequities in information sharing. However, short-term costs for individual researchers (insufficient institutional incentives to engage in open science and knowledge mobilization) remain a challenge. We caution against a passive approach to sharing that simply involves making information available. We advocate a proactive stance toward transparency, communication, collaboration, and capacity building that involves seeking out and engaging with potential users to maximize the environmental and societal impact of conservation science 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a acceso abierto 
650 4 |a critical appraisal 
650 4 |a código abierto 
650 4 |a datos abiertos 
650 4 |a evidence-based decision-making 
650 4 |a knowledge mobilization 
650 4 |a movilización del conocimiento 
650 4 |a open access 
650 4 |a open code 
650 4 |a open data 
650 4 |a open education resources 
650 4 |a recursos educativos abiertos 
650 4 |a toma de decisiones basada en evidencias 
650 4 |a transparencia 
650 4 |a transparency 
650 4 |a valuación crítica 
650 4 |a 严格评价 
650 4 |a 开放代码 
650 4 |a 开放存取 
650 4 |a 开放教育资源 
650 4 |a 开放数据 
650 4 |a 循证决策 
650 4 |a 知识动员 
650 4 |a 透明度 
700 1 |a O'Dea, Rose E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kerr, Kecia A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rytwinski, Trina  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schuster, Richard  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nguyen, Vivian M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Young, Nathan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bennett, Joseph R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cooke, Steven J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 36(2022), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite e13835  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g day:20  |g month:06  |g pages:e13835 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13835  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 36  |j 2022  |e 3  |b 20  |c 06  |h e13835