Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis of the elbow : a comparison with open débridement of the extensor origin

© 2021 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 5(2021), 3 vom: 18. Mai, Seite 578-587
1. Verfasser: Noh, Young Min (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Kong, Gyu Min, Moon, Sang Won, Jang, Hyo Seok, Kim, Seungchul, Bak, Gyeong Gu, Kim, Youngbok
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article Débridement Extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) Lateral epicondylitis Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) Reconstruction
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2021 The Author(s).
BACKGROUND: Based on the controversy over whether the extensor tendon is the only lesion of lateral epicondylitis of the elbow and numerous reports of concomitant lateral collateral ligament involvement, potential damage to the lateral collateral ligament complex should be considered for the treatment
METHODS: About 25 elbows in 23 patients (débridement group) and 22 elbows in 20 patients (reconstruction group) who were diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and had an average of 22 months of symptoms revealing anatomical lesion on MRI were included. The capitellum-sublime tubercle-radial head (CSR) angle was measured on both sides preoperatively, and the visual analog scale (VAS) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were measured over 12 months, postoperatively
RESULTS: The initial preoperative mean VAS was statistically significant with 4.6 in the débridement group and 6.5 in the reconstruction group (P < .05). Postoperative VAS was continuously decreased in both groups with no significant difference at each assessment period (P < .05) but showed more rapid improvement in the reconstruction group compared with the débridement group. For MEPS, the reconstruction group showed significant improvement during the follow-up periods, and at the final follow-up MEPS, 3 cases in the débridement group and 0 cases in the reconstruction group showed a poor result, which was considered as surgery failure. The CSR angle of the affected side (7.2 ± 1.9) was significantly larger than that of the normal side (3.6 ± 1.5) (P < .05) in the reconstruction group. Increased CSR by more than 5 degrees was identified as a significant predictive indicator for potential concomitant ligament insufficiency (area under curve = 0.875, P < .001) showing 80.9% of the sensitivity, 82.1% of the specificity
CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis, lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction added to the débridement of extensor origin may provide better results for the patients with suspicious lateral ligament insufficiency or failed previous surgery
Beschreibung:Date Revised 24.04.2022
published: Electronic-eCollection
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:2666-6383
DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.006