Regional apparent density correlations within the proximal humerus

© 2021 The Author(s).

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:JSES international. - 2020. - 5(2021), 3 vom: 18. Mai, Seite 525-531
Auteur principal: Reeves, Jacob M (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Vanasse, Tom, Roche, Chris, Athwal, George S, Johnson, James A, Faber, Kenneth J, Langohr, G Daniel G
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2021
Accès à la collection:JSES international
Sujets:Journal Article Apparent bone density Apparent density Bone quality Density correlation Proximal humerus Shoulder arthorplasty Thumb test
Description
Résumé:© 2021 The Author(s).
BACKGROUND: Bone quality influences humeral implant selection for shoulder arthroplasty. However, little is known about how well bone near the humeral resection represents more distal cancellous bone. This investigation aimed to quantify the correlations between the apparent density of sites near the humeral head resection plane and cancellous sites throughout the metaphysis
METHODS: Using computed tomography data from 98 subjects, apparent bone density was quantified in 65 regions throughout the proximal humerus. Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined comparing the density between samples from the humeral resection and all supporting regions beneath the resection. Mean correlation coefficients were compared for (i) each sample region with all support regions, (ii) pooling all sample regions within a slice, and (iii) considering sample regions correlated with only the support regions in the same anatomic section
RESULTS: Stronger correlations existed for bone sampled beneath the resection (0.33 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.88 ± 0.10), instead of from the resected humeral head (0.22 ± 0.10≤ r ≤ 0.66 ± 0.14). None of sample region correlated strongly with all support regions; however, strong correlations existed when sample and support regions both came from the same anatomic section
DISCUSSION: Assessments of cancellous bone quality in the proximal humerus should be made beneath the humeral resection not in the resected humeral head; and each anatomic quadrant should be assessed independently
Description:Date Revised 24.04.2022
published: Electronic-eCollection
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:2666-6383
DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.001