|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM32605877X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250301185523.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.13776
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n1086.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM32605877X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)34057247
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Bobier, Christopher
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The virtue of compassion in compassionate conservation
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2022
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 06.04.2022
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 06.04.2022
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2021 Society for Conservation Biology.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The role of ethics is becoming an increasingly important feature of biodiversity conservation dialogue and practice. Compassionate conservationists argue for a prohibition of, or at least a strong presumption against, the adoption of conservation policies that intentionally harm animals. They assert that to be compassionate is to care about animals and that it is antithetical to caring for animals to intentionally harm them. Compassionate conservationists thus criticize many existing conservation practices and policies. Two things together challenge the philosophical foundation of compassionate conservation. First, compassionate conservationists ground their theory in virtue ethics, yet virtue ethics permits exceptions to moral rules, so there cannot be an in-principle prohibition on adopting intentional harm-inducing policies and practices. But not all compassionate conservationists advocate for a prohibition on intentionally harming animals, only a strong presumption against it. This leads to the second point: compassion can motivate a person to adopt a harm-inducing conservation policy or practice when doing so is the best available option in a situation in which animals will be harmed no matter what policy or practice is adopted. Combining these insights with the empirical observation that conservationists regularly find themselves in tragic situations, we arrive at the conclusion that conservationists may regularly advocate for harm-inducing policies and practices from a position of compassion. Article Impact Statement: Compassionate conservationists should accept that the virtuously compassionate person may adopt harm-causing conservation policies
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a biodiversity conservation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a conservación de la biodiversidad
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a control letal
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a killing
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a lethal control
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a manejo de fauna
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a matanzas
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a virtue ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a wildlife management
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a ética de las virtudes
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Allen, Benjamin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1989
|g 36(2022), 1 vom: 05. Feb., Seite e13776
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnas
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:36
|g year:2022
|g number:1
|g day:05
|g month:02
|g pages:e13776
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13776
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 36
|j 2022
|e 1
|b 05
|c 02
|h e13776
|