A critical review of the compassionate conservation debate

© 2021 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 36(2022), 1 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e13760
1. Verfasser: Coghlan, Simon (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Cardilini, Adam P A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review animal ethics animal welfare bienestar animal conservation management environmental ethics environmental philosophy filosofía ambiental mehr... gestión de la conservación ética ambiental 保护管理 动物伦理 动物福利 环境伦理 环境哲学
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM326058699
003 DE-627
005 20250301185522.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13760  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1086.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM326058699 
035 |a (NLM)34057240 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Coghlan, Simon  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A critical review of the compassionate conservation debate 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 06.04.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 06.04.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Compassionate conservation holds that compassion should transform conservation. It has prompted heated debate and has been criticized strongly. We reviewed the debate to characterize compassionate conservation and to philosophically analyze critiques that are recurring and that warrant further critical attention. The necessary elements of compassionate conservation relate to the moral value of sentient animals and conservation and to science and conservation practice. Although compassionate conservation has several nontraditional necessary conditions, it also importantly allows a degree of pluralism in values and scientific judgment regarding animals and conservation practice. We identified 52 specific criticisms from 11 articles that directly critique compassionate conservation. We closely examined 33 of these because they recurred regularly or included substantial questions that required further response. Critics criticized compassionate conservation's ethical foundations, scientific credentials, clarity of application, understanding of compassion, its alleged threat to conservation and biodiversity. Some criticisms, we found, are question begging, confused, or overlook conceptual complexity. These criticisms raise questions for critics and proponents, regarding, for example, equal versus differential intrinsic moral value of different sentient animals (including humans), problems of natural and human-caused suffering of wild animals and predation, and the acceptability of specific conservation practices within compassionate conservation. By addressing recurring and faulty critiques of compassionate conservation and identifying issues for compassionate conservation to address, this review provides a clearer basis for crucial ongoing interdisciplinary dialogue about ethics, values, and conservation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a animal ethics 
650 4 |a animal welfare 
650 4 |a bienestar animal 
650 4 |a conservation management 
650 4 |a environmental ethics 
650 4 |a environmental philosophy 
650 4 |a filosofía ambiental 
650 4 |a gestión de la conservación 
650 4 |a ética ambiental 
650 4 |a 保护管理 
650 4 |a 动物伦理 
650 4 |a 动物福利 
650 4 |a 环境伦理 
650 4 |a 环境哲学 
700 1 |a Cardilini, Adam P A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 36(2022), 1 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e13760  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g day:01  |g month:02  |g pages:e13760 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13760  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 36  |j 2022  |e 1  |b 01  |c 02  |h e13760