A classification framework for interspecific trade-offs in aquatic ecology

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 36(2022), 1 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e13762
1. Verfasser:	Smyth, Eric R B (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser:	Drake, D Andrew R
Format:	Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:	Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:	Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review conflict resolution consecuencias no deseadas control de especies invasoras decision-making fishery management invasive species control manejo de pesquerías mehr... resolución de conflictos toma de decisiones unintended consequences

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	© 2021 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Conservation Biology © 2021 Society for Conservation Biology. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. In some cases, wildlife management objectives directed at multiple species can conflict with one another, creating species trade-offs. For managers to effectively identify trade-offs and avoid their undesirable outcomes, they must understand the agents involved and their corresponding interactions. A literature review of interspecific trade-offs within freshwater and marine ecosystems was conducted to illustrate the scope of potential interspecific trade-offs that may occur. We identified common pitfalls that lead to failed recognition of interspecific trade-offs, including, single-species management and limited consideration of the spatial and temporal scale of ecosystems and their management regimes. We devised a classification framework of common interspecific trade-offs within aquatic systems. The classification can help managers determine whether the conflict is species based through direct relationships (i.e., predator-prey, competition, other antagonistic relationships) or indirect relationships involving intermediate species (i.e., conflict-generating species) or whether the conflict is driven by opposing management objectives for species that would otherwise not interact (i.e., nontarget management effects). Once the nature and scope of trade-offs are understood, existing decision-making tools, such as structured decision-making and real-options analysis, can be incorporated to improve the management of aquatic ecosystems. Article Impact Statement: A synthesis of interspecific trade-offs in aquatic ecosystems supports their identification and resolution
Beschreibung:	Date Completed 06.04.2022 Date Revised 06.04.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:	1523-1739
DOI:	10.1111/cobi.13762