Evaluating outcomes of conservation with multidimensional indicators of well-being

© 2021 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 35(2021), 5 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 1417-1425
1. Verfasser: Mbaru, Emmanuel K (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Hicks, Christina C, Gurney, Georgina G, Cinner, Joshua E
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't bienestar humano dimensiones sociales evaluación de impacto fisheries human dimensions human well-being impact evaluation pesquerías mehr... redes sociales social network
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM324916736
003 DE-627
005 20231225191331.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13743  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1083.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM324916736 
035 |a (NLM)33938596 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Mbaru, Emmanuel K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluating outcomes of conservation with multidimensional indicators of well-being 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 28.10.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 28.10.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Many conservation interventions are hypothesized to be beneficial for both the environment and people's well-being, but this has rarely been tested rigorously. We examined the effects of adoption or nonadoption of a conservation intervention on 3 dimensions of people's well-being (material, relational, and subjective) over time. We focused on a fisheries bycatch management initiative intended to reduce environmental externalities associated with resource extraction. We collected panel data from fishers (n = 250) in villages with (adopters and nonadopters) and without (control) the conservation intervention 3 times over 2 years. We found no evidence that adoption reduced any of the 3 dimensions of well-being in the local populations affected by the intervention. There were modest improvements in material (t = -1.58) and subjective livelihood well-being (p = 0.04) for adopters relative to nonadopters over time. The variations in well-being experiences (in terms of magnitude of change) among adopters, nonadopters, and controls across the different domains over time affirmed the dynamic and social nature of well-being 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a bienestar humano 
650 4 |a dimensiones sociales 
650 4 |a evaluación de impacto 
650 4 |a fisheries 
650 4 |a human dimensions 
650 4 |a human well-being 
650 4 |a impact evaluation 
650 4 |a pesquerías 
650 4 |a redes sociales 
650 4 |a social network 
700 1 |a Hicks, Christina C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gurney, Georgina G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cinner, Joshua E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 35(2021), 5 vom: 29. Okt., Seite 1417-1425  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:5  |g day:29  |g month:10  |g pages:1417-1425 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13743  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 35  |j 2021  |e 5  |b 29  |c 10  |h 1417-1425