Climate and functional traits jointly mediate tree water-use strategies
© 2021 The Authors New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation.
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist. - 1979. - 231(2021), 2 vom: 23. Juli, Seite 617-630 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2021
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | The New phytologist |
Schlagworte: | Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. climate meta-analysis sap flow trait coordination tree height water conductance water-relations traits mehr... |
Zusammenfassung: | © 2021 The Authors New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation. Tree water use is central to plant function and ecosystem fluxes. However, it is still unknown how organ-level water-relations traits are coordinated to determine whole-tree water-use strategies in response to drought, and whether this coordination depends on climate. Here we used a global sap flow database (SAPFLUXNET) to study the response of water use, in terms of whole-tree canopy conductance (G), to vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and to soil water content (SWC) for 142 tree species. We investigated the individual and coordinated effect of six water-relations traits (vulnerability to embolism, Huber value, hydraulic conductivity, turgor-loss point, rooting depth and leaf size) on water-use parameters, also accounting for the effect of tree height and climate (mean annual precipitation, MAP). Reference G and its sensitivity to VPD were tightly coordinated with water-relations traits rather than with MAP. Species with efficient xylem transport had higher canopy conductance but also higher sensitivity to VPD. Moreover, we found that angiosperms had higher reference G and higher sensitivity to VPD than did gymnosperms. Our results highlight the need to consider trait integration and reveal the complications and challenges of defining a single, whole-plant resource use spectrum ranging from 'acquisitive' to 'conservative' |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 18.06.2021 Date Revised 28.08.2021 published: Print-Electronic ErratumIn: New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(3):1519. - PMID 34453859 Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1469-8137 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nph.17404 |