LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM324410573
003 DE-627
005 20250301121327.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/gcb.15650  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1081.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM324410573 
035 |a (NLM)33887083 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Suraci, Justin P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Disturbance type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 06.08.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 06.08.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
520 |a Human activity and land use change impact every landscape on Earth, driving declines in many animal species while benefiting others. Species ecological and life history traits may predict success in human-dominated landscapes such that only species with "winning" combinations of traits will persist in disturbed environments. However, this link between species traits and successful coexistence with humans remains obscured by the complexity of anthropogenic disturbances and variability among study systems. We compiled detection data for 24 mammal species from 61 populations across North America to quantify the effects of (1) the direct presence of people and (2) the human footprint (landscape modification) on mammal occurrence and activity levels. Thirty-three percent of mammal species exhibited a net negative response (i.e., reduced occurrence or activity) to increasing human presence and/or footprint across populations, whereas 58% of species were positively associated with increasing disturbance. However, apparent benefits of human presence and footprint tended to decrease or disappear at higher disturbance levels, indicative of thresholds in mammal species' capacity to tolerate disturbance or exploit human-dominated landscapes. Species ecological and life history traits were strong predictors of their responses to human footprint, with increasing footprint favoring smaller, less carnivorous, faster-reproducing species. The positive and negative effects of human presence were distributed more randomly with respect to species trait values, with apparent winners and losers across a range of body sizes and dietary guilds. Differential responses by some species to human presence and human footprint highlight the importance of considering these two forms of human disturbance separately when estimating anthropogenic impacts on wildlife. Our approach provides insights into the complex mechanisms through which human activities shape mammal communities globally, revealing the drivers of the loss of larger predators in human-modified landscapes 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a anthropogenic disturbance 
650 4 |a carnivore 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a environmental filter 
650 4 |a human footprint index 
650 4 |a human-wildlife coexistence 
650 4 |a occupancy 
650 4 |a traits 
650 4 |a ungulate 
650 4 |a wildlife 
700 1 |a Gaynor, Kaitlyn M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Allen, Maximilian L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Alexander, Peter  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brashares, Justin S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cendejas-Zarelli, Sara  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Crooks, Kevin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Elbroch, L Mark  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Forrester, Tavis  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Green, Austin M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Haight, Jeffrey  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Harris, Nyeema C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hebblewhite, Mark  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Isbell, Forest  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Johnston, Barbara  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kays, Roland  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lendrum, Patrick E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lewis, Jesse S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McInturff, Alex  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McShea, William  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Murphy, Thomas W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Palmer, Meredith S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Parsons, Arielle  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Parsons, Mitchell A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pendergast, Mary E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pekins, Charles  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Prugh, Laura R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sager-Fradkin, Kimberly A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schuttler, Stephanie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Şekercioğlu, Çağan H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shepherd, Brenda  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Whipple, Laura  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Whittington, Jesse  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wittemyer, George  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wilmers, Christopher C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Global change biology  |d 1999  |g 27(2021), 16 vom: 17. Aug., Seite 3718-3731  |w (DE-627)NLM098239996  |x 1365-2486  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2021  |g number:16  |g day:17  |g month:08  |g pages:3718-3731 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15650  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 27  |j 2021  |e 16  |b 17  |c 08  |h 3718-3731