|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM322953227 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231225183130.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.13732
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1076.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM322953227
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)33738830
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Kadykalo, Andrew N
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Bridging research and practice in conservation
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2021
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 27.01.2022
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 21.07.2022
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Calls for biodiversity conservation practice to be more evidence based are growing, and we agree evidence use in conservation practice needs improvement. However, evidence-based conservation will not be realized without improved access to evidence. In medicine, unlike in conservation, a well-established and well-funded layer of intermediary individuals and organizations engage with medical practitioners, synthesize primary research relevant to decision making, and make evidence easily accessible. These intermediaries prepare targeted evidence summaries and distribute them to practitioners faced with time-sensitive and value-laden decisions. To be effective, these intermediaries, who we refer to as evidence bridges, should identify research topics based on the priorities of practitioners; synthesize evidence; prepare and distribute easy-to-find and easy-to-use evidence summaries; and develop and maintain networks of connections with researchers and practitioners. Based on a review of the literature regarding evidence intermediaries in conservation and environmental management, as well as an anonymous questionnaire searching for such organizations, we found few intermediaries that met all these criteria. Few evidence bridges that do exist are unable to reach most conservation practitioners, which include resource managers in government and industry, conservation organizations, and farmers and other private landowners. We argue that the lack of evidence bridges from research to practitioners contributes to evidence complacency and limits the use of evidence in conservation action. Nevertheless, several existing organizations help reduce the gap between evidence and practice and could serve as a foundation for building additional components of evidence bridges in conservation. Although evidence bridges need expertise in research and evidence synthesis, they also require expertise in identifying and communicating with the community of practitioners most in need of clear and concise syntheses of evidence. Article Impact Statement: Evidence-based conservation will not be realized without improved access to evidence. We call for intermediary evidence bridges
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Review
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a brecha en la implementación de la investigación
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a conservación basada en la evidencia
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a environmental evidence
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a evidence-based conservation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a evidence-informed decision making
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a evidencia ambiental
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a intercambio de conocimiento
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a intermediario de conocimiento
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a knowledge broker
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a knowledge exchange
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a knowledge translation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a manejo de recursos naturales
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a natural resource management
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a research-implementation gap
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a toma de decisiones guiada por la evidencia
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a traducción del conocimiento
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 基于证据的保护
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 循证决策
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 环境证据
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 知识中介
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 知识交流
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 知识转化
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 研究与实施的差距
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 自然资源管理
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Buxton, Rachel T
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Morrison, Peter
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Anderson, Christine M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bickerton, Holly
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Francis, Charles M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Smith, Adam C
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fahrig, Lenore
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 35(2021), 6 vom: 18. Dez., Seite 1725-1737
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:35
|g year:2021
|g number:6
|g day:18
|g month:12
|g pages:1725-1737
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13732
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 35
|j 2021
|e 6
|b 18
|c 12
|h 1725-1737
|