Comparison of clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs : a meta-analysis

© 2020 The Authors.

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:JSES international. - 2020. - 5(2021), 2 vom: 09. März, Seite 254-260
Auteur principal: Paramasivam Meenakshi Sundaram, Pirateb (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Lee, Wei Wen Bryan, Sayampanathan, Andrew Arjun, Tan, Hwee Chye Andrew
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2021
Accès à la collection:JSES international
Sujets:Journal Article Review Rotator cuff repair double row knot tying knotless transosseous-equivalent
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM322390761
003 DE-627
005 20250301041407.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.007  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1074.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM322390761 
035 |a (NLM)33681845 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Paramasivam Meenakshi Sundaram, Pirateb  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs  |b a meta-analysis 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 21.04.2022 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 The Authors. 
520 |a BACKGROUND: The ideal rotator cuff repair technique should allow for a quick and simple arthroscopic application which provides both adequate biomechanical stability and an appropriate biological state with the intention of promoting eventual healing of tendon to bone. While the biomechanical superiority of double-row repairs including higher repair strength, reduced gap formation, and wider footprint restoration have been proven, controversy remains regarding the clinical benefits of knotless compared with knot tying techniques. Our study aims to review the available evidence in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless transosseous double-row rotator cuff repair techniques 
520 |a METHODS: A systematic literature search via PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the double-row knotted and knotless surgical techniques were identified. Data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.3, using Mantel-Haenszel statistics with both fixed and random effect models 
520 |a RESULTS: A total of 1144 studies were identified from our initial search. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies were eventually selected for our review. The selected studies were published between 2012 and 2018. Of the 8 studies, 3 reported level 2 evidence and 5 reported level 3 evidence. There were a total of 589 subjects. Our meta-analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in functional outcomes postoperatively when comparing Constant score (mean difference = -1.85, 95% confidence interval: -4.42 to 0.73), University of California at Los Angeles score (mean differences = -0.14, 95% confidence interval: -0.90 to 0.62), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean differences = -2.19, 95% confidence interval: -5.55 to 1.17) between patients who underwent knotted and knotless rotator cuff repairs 
520 |a DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSION: Our review revealed no statistically significant difference in functional outcomes between knotted and knotless transosseous double-row techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis related to this topic. However, no level 1 studies were available for this review. Further studies related to this topic should focus on reporting level 1 evidence comparing the clinical outcomes of knotless and knotted techniques for double-row repairs 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a Rotator cuff repair 
650 4 |a double row 
650 4 |a knot tying 
650 4 |a knotless 
650 4 |a transosseous-equivalent 
700 1 |a Lee, Wei Wen Bryan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sayampanathan, Andrew Arjun  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tan, Hwee Chye Andrew  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 5(2021), 2 vom: 09. März, Seite 254-260  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g day:09  |g month:03  |g pages:254-260 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.007  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 5  |j 2021  |e 2  |b 09  |c 03  |h 254-260