Importance of health assessments for conservation in noncaptive wildlife

© 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 36(2022), 1 vom: 30. Feb., Seite e13724
1. Verfasser: Kophamel, Sara (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Illing, Björn, Ariel, Ellen, Difalco, Morgan, Skerratt, Lee F, Hamann, Mark, Ward, Leigh C, Méndez, Diana, Munns, Suzanne L
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Review biodiversity hotspots conceptual framework diagnostic techniques hotspots de biodiversidad listas rojas marco conceptual mehr... red lists revisión sistemática sample size systematic review tamaño muestral técnicas diagnósticas vertebrados vertebrates 样本量 概念框架 生物多样性热点 系统综述 红色名录 脊椎动物 诊断技术
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM321926765
003 DE-627
005 20231225180935.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13724  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1073.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM321926765 
035 |a (NLM)33634525 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kophamel, Sara  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Importance of health assessments for conservation in noncaptive wildlife 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 06.04.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 21.07.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Wildlife health assessments help identify populations at risk of starvation, disease, and decline from anthropogenic impacts on natural habitats. We conducted an overview of available health assessment studies in noncaptive vertebrates and devised a framework to strategically integrate health assessments in population monitoring. Using a systematic approach, we performed a thorough assessment of studies examining multiple health parameters of noncaptive vertebrate species from 1982 to 2020 (n = 261 studies). We quantified trends in study design and diagnostic methods across taxa with generalized linear models, bibliometric analyses, and visual representations of study location versus biodiversity hotspots. Only 35% of studies involved international or cross-border collaboration. Countries with both high and threatened biodiversity were greatly underrepresented. Species that were not listed as threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List represented 49% of assessed species, a trend likely associated with the regional focus of most studies. We strongly suggest following wildlife health assessment protocols when planning a study and using statistically adequate sample sizes for studies establishing reference ranges. Across all taxa blood analysis (89%), body composition assessments (81%), physical examination (72%), and fecal analyses (24% of studies) were the most common methods. A conceptual framework to improve design and standardize wildlife health assessments includes guidelines on the experimental design, data acquisition and analysis, and species conservation planning and management implications. Integrating a physiological and ecological understanding of species resilience toward threatening processes will enable informed decision making regarding the conservation of threatened species 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a biodiversity hotspots 
650 4 |a conceptual framework 
650 4 |a diagnostic techniques 
650 4 |a hotspots de biodiversidad 
650 4 |a listas rojas 
650 4 |a marco conceptual 
650 4 |a red lists 
650 4 |a revisión sistemática 
650 4 |a sample size 
650 4 |a systematic review 
650 4 |a tamaño muestral 
650 4 |a técnicas diagnósticas 
650 4 |a vertebrados 
650 4 |a vertebrates 
650 4 |a 样本量 
650 4 |a 概念框架 
650 4 |a 生物多样性热点 
650 4 |a 系统综述 
650 4 |a 红色名录 
650 4 |a 脊椎动物 
650 4 |a 诊断技术 
700 1 |a Illing, Björn  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ariel, Ellen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Difalco, Morgan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Skerratt, Lee F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hamann, Mark  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ward, Leigh C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Méndez, Diana  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Munns, Suzanne L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 36(2022), 1 vom: 30. Feb., Seite e13724  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g day:30  |g month:02  |g pages:e13724 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13724  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 36  |j 2022  |e 1  |b 30  |c 02  |h e13724