|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM320592308 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231225173918.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3054719
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1068.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM320592308
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)33497328
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Vandenhende, Simon
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks
|b A Survey
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2022
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 07.06.2022
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a With the advent of deep learning, many dense prediction tasks, i.e., tasks that produce pixel-level predictions, have seen significant performance improvements. The typical approach is to learn these tasks in isolation, that is, a separate neural network is trained for each individual task. Yet, recent multi-task learning (MTL) techniques have shown promising results w.r.t. performance, computations and/or memory footprint, by jointly tackling multiple tasks through a learned shared representation. In this survey, we provide a well-rounded view on state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for MTL in computer vision, explicitly emphasizing on dense prediction tasks. Our contributions concern the following. First, we consider MTL from a network architecture point-of-view. We include an extensive overview and discuss the advantages/disadvantages of recent popular MTL models. Second, we examine various optimization methods to tackle the joint learning of multiple tasks. We summarize the qualitative elements of these works and explore their commonalities and differences. Finally, we provide an extensive experimental evaluation across a variety of dense prediction benchmarks to examine the pros and cons of the different methods, including both architectural and optimization based strategies
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Georgoulis, Stamatios
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Van Gansbeke, Wouter
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Proesmans, Marc
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Dai, Dengxin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Van Gool, Luc
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
|d 1979
|g 44(2022), 7 vom: 03. Juli, Seite 3614-3633
|w (DE-627)NLM098212257
|x 1939-3539
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:44
|g year:2022
|g number:7
|g day:03
|g month:07
|g pages:3614-3633
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3054719
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 44
|j 2022
|e 7
|b 03
|c 07
|h 3614-3633
|