First report of Diaporthe eres causing branch canker on Cinnamomum camphora (camphor tree) in Jiangxi Province, China

In September 2019, approximately 75 to 90% of camphor trees (Cinnamomum camphora) were observed with cankers and branch dieback symptoms in Anyi (N28°32'54'', E115°37'52'') and Xinyu (N27°37'38'', E114°50'25'') county (Jiangxi Province, Chi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - (2021) vom: 04. Jan.
1. Verfasser: Li, Da (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Zhang, Haiyan, Song, Qingni, Liu, Jun, Yang, Qingpei, Luan, Fenggang, Li, Dong
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article <italic>Diaporthe eres</italic> Canker Cinnamomum camphora branch dieback
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM319573524
003 DE-627
005 20240229143047.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-10-20-2306-PDN  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1303.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM319573524 
035 |a (NLM)33393359 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Li, Da  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a First report of Diaporthe eres causing branch canker on Cinnamomum camphora (camphor tree) in Jiangxi Province, China 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 22.02.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status Publisher 
520 |a In September 2019, approximately 75 to 90% of camphor trees (Cinnamomum camphora) were observed with cankers and branch dieback symptoms in Anyi (N28°32'54'', E115°37'52'') and Xinyu (N27°37'38'', E114°50'25'') county (Jiangxi Province, China). The symptoms included dark brown to dark, oval-shaped canker lesions, sunken and cracked longitudinally, cracked and evenly swelling, or reddish brown (Figure 1 A-D). Samples were collected from symptomatic branches and were cut into small pieces (ca. 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm). Sections were surface sterilized as described by Zhang et al. (2020), then placed on potato dextrose agar amended with 0.01% penicillin and 0.015% streptomycin sulfate and incubated in the laboratory at 25℃ with darkness. After 3 to 5 days, mycelium growing out from tissues were transferred onto PDA medium. In total, 68 fungal isolates including 22 isolates of Diaporthe sp. were obtained from cankers and then were classified into five categories based on morphological characteristics and sequencing of the ITS for morphological representative strains. Pathogenicity tests were conducted in the greenhouse (Figure 1 E-M) and field (Figure 1 N-Q). Branches were surface sterilized and inoculated as described by Prencipe et al. (2017). In the greenhouse, a total of 13 representative isolates (including 6 isolates of Diaporthe sp., 2 isolates of Neofusicoccum sp., 2 isolates of Botryosphaeria sp. and 3 isolates of Colletotrichum sp.) were selected and evaluated using 2-year-old seedlings of camphor tree in pots with 5 replicates per isolate, in which 3 isolates of Collectotrichum sp. had no pathogenicity. Then, two isolates of Diaporthe sp. (Z4 and Z7) were selected for field experiment. In field tests, the same method was used as in the greenhouse. The inoculated and control branches were collected 40 days after inoculation and the fungi were isolated and placed on PDA plates to recover the inoculated fungi and complete Koch's postulates. Both isolates of Diaporthe sp. produced canker symptoms on the branches. Isolate Z4 caused discoloration also on the branch without wounding. Both isolates produced pycnidia scattered in PDA plates supplemented with stems of alfalfa, were dark brown to black, globose to subglobose (Figure 1 T). Alpha conidia were cylindrical, 5.72-9.98 µm (mean 7.64 µm) × 2.15-3.13 µm (mean 2.69 µm) (n = 30) (Figure 1 S, red arrow), while beta conidia were biguttulate, one-celled, hyaline, non-septate, and 16.21-25.52 µm (mean 21.60 µm) × 0.76~1.65 µm (mean 1.14 µm) (n = 30, green arrow) (Figure 1 S). Five isolates (Z4, S-Z4, P-Z4, Z7 and S-Z7) including those used for pathogenicity test were selected for multi-locus phylogenetic analyses of ITS (White et al., 1990), TEF1-α and TUB2 (Glass et al. 1995) gene sequences, which the accession number was MW036358- MW036362 for ITS, MW052267- MW052271 for TEF1- α, MW052276-MW052280 for TUB2. Based on the phylogenetic tree analysis using IQ-TREE 2, all five isolates were identified as D. eres (Figure 2). D. eres has been reported to cause canker on many different woody plants, such as almond (Holland et al. 2020), peach (Prencipe et al. 2017), hazelnut (Wiman et al. 2019), and so on. However, this is the first report worldwide of D. eres causing disease on Cinnamomum camphora in China 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a <italic>Diaporthe eres</italic> 
650 4 |a Canker 
650 4 |a Cinnamomum camphora 
650 4 |a branch dieback 
700 1 |a Zhang, Haiyan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Song, Qingni  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Jun  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yang, Qingpei  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Luan, Fenggang  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Li, Dong  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g (2021) vom: 04. Jan.  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2021  |g day:04  |g month:01 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-20-2306-PDN  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2021  |b 04  |c 01