Biohythane production from food waste in a two-stage process : assessing the energy recovery potential

ABSTRACTBiohythane (hydrogen + methane) production in a two stage dark fermentation (DF) and anaerobic digestion (AD) process from food waste (FW) has been studied. This paper investigated the effect of operation temperature, i.e. mesophilic (34 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) , on biohythane yield and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental technology. - 1993. - 43(2022), 14 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 2190-2196
1. Verfasser: Ghimire, Anish (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Luongo, Vincenzo, Frunzo, Luigi, Lens, Piet N L, Pirozzi, Francesco, Esposito, Giovanni
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Environmental technology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Biohythane anaerobic digestion dark fermentation food waste Hydrogen 7YNJ3PO35Z Methane OP0UW79H66
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM319214117
003 DE-627
005 20231225170958.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09593330.2020.1869319  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1064.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM319214117 
035 |a (NLM)33357020 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ghimire, Anish  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Biohythane production from food waste in a two-stage process  |b assessing the energy recovery potential 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 23.05.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 23.05.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a ABSTRACTBiohythane (hydrogen + methane) production in a two stage dark fermentation (DF) and anaerobic digestion (AD) process from food waste (FW) has been studied. This paper investigated the effect of operation temperature, i.e. mesophilic (34 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) , on biohythane yield and total energy recovery carried out at the initial culture pH 5.5 and pH 7, respectively for DF and AD batch tests. The mesophilic DF tests gave a higher hydrogen yield of 53.5 (±4) mL H2/g VS added compared to thermophilic DF tests, i.e. 37.6 (±1) mL H2/g VS added. However, higher methane yields, i.e. 307.5 (± 10) mL CH4/g VS, were obtained at thermophilic AD tests compared to mesophilic AD, i.e. 276.5 (±4.3) mL CH4/g VS. The total energy recovery from thermophilic DF + AD was higher (11.4 MJ/kg VS) than the mesophilic (10.4 MJ/kg VS) combined process. Interestingly, the analysis of kinetic parameters of mesophilic tests, determined from the Modified Gompertz equation, showed that mesophilic DF had faster H2 production kinetics, which can be attributed to a faster adaptation of the heat-shocked inoculum used in the tests to the incubation temperature. However, thermophilic AD tests exhibited faster kinetics for methane production 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Biohythane 
650 4 |a anaerobic digestion 
650 4 |a dark fermentation 
650 4 |a food waste 
650 7 |a Hydrogen  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 7YNJ3PO35Z  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Methane  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a OP0UW79H66  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Luongo, Vincenzo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Frunzo, Luigi  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lens, Piet N L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pirozzi, Francesco  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Esposito, Giovanni  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Environmental technology  |d 1993  |g 43(2022), 14 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 2190-2196  |w (DE-627)NLM098202545  |x 1479-487X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2022  |g number:14  |g day:01  |g month:06  |g pages:2190-2196 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1869319  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 43  |j 2022  |e 14  |b 01  |c 06  |h 2190-2196