Double-screw and quadruple-button fixation for the glenoid : Latarjet versus bone block applications

Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 4(2020), 4 vom: 11. Dez., Seite 780-785
1. Verfasser: Reeves, Jacob M (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Athwal, George S, Johnson, James A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article EndoButton Latarjet bone block bone graft button coracoid shoulder
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM319100472
003 DE-627
005 20231225170734.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.015  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1063.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM319100472 
035 |a (NLM)33345215 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Reeves, Jacob M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Double-screw and quadruple-button fixation for the glenoid  |b Latarjet versus bone block applications 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 19.04.2022 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. 
520 |a BACKGROUND: The Latarjet and bone block procedures can be secured with screws or cortical buttons. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare quadruple buttons vs. double screws for fixation of anterior glenoid bone grafts 
520 |a METHODS: Twelve cadaveric scapulae (6 pairs) were denuded, resected, and potted. Pairs were randomized to quadruple-button or double-screw fixation after creation of a 15% anterior glenoid defect. The specimens underwent cyclic uniaxial compressive glenoid loading between 50 and 200 N for 1000 cycles at 1 Hz. Testing was repeated for conjoint tendon loads of 0 N (simulating a bone block procedure), 10 N, and 20 N (simulating a Latarjet procedure). Peak resultant relative coracoid graft displacement was optically tracked at 3 points (superior, central, and inferior) on the edge of the coracoid 
520 |a RESULTS: No significant differences were found between buttons and screws for bone block applications or with 10 N of conjoint tendon loading (P ≥ .095). At 20 N of conjoint tendon loading, however, the screws were significantly more stable than the buttons (P ≤ .023). During the initial 20-N conjoint load application, all 3 points displaced significantly more with the button reconstruction than with the screws (P ≤ .01). Overall, mean displacements did not exceed 1 mm at any position on the coracoid, regardless of testing condition 
520 |a CONCLUSIONS: The quadruple-button technique is comparable to screws when the coracoid is used as a bone block or when conjoint tendon loading is minimized. However, at higher conjoint tendon loads, the screws produced a more stable coracoid graft than the buttons 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a EndoButton 
650 4 |a Latarjet 
650 4 |a bone block 
650 4 |a bone graft 
650 4 |a button 
650 4 |a coracoid 
650 4 |a shoulder 
700 1 |a Athwal, George S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Johnson, James A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 4(2020), 4 vom: 11. Dez., Seite 780-785  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2020  |g number:4  |g day:11  |g month:12  |g pages:780-785 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.015  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 4  |j 2020  |e 4  |b 11  |c 12  |h 780-785