Psychological drivers of risk-reducing behaviors to limit human-wildlife conflict

© 2020 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 34(2020), 6 vom: 16. Dez., Seite 1383-1392
1. Verfasser: Lischka, Stacy A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Teel, Tara L, Johnson, Heather E, Larson, Courtney, Breck, Stewart, Crooks, Kevin
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Colorado behavior change black bears compliance human-black bear conflict pro-environmental behavior  黑熊 mehr... 人类与黑熊的冲突 服从性 环保行为 科罗拉多 行为改变
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM318122871
003 DE-627
005 20231225164709.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13626  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1060.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM318122871 
035 |a (NLM)33245812 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Lischka, Stacy A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Psychological drivers of risk-reducing behaviors to limit human-wildlife conflict 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.02.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 26.02.2021 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Conflicts between people and wild animals are increasing globally, often with serious consequences for both. Local regulations or ordinances are frequently used to promote human behaviors that minimize these conflicts (risk-reducing behaviors), but compliance with ordinances can be highly variable. While efforts to increase compliance could be improved through applications of conservation psychology, little is known about the relative influence of different factors motivating compliance. Using concepts from psychology and risk theory, we conducted a longitudinal study pairing data from mail surveys with direct observations of compliance with a wildlife ordinance requiring residents to secure residential garbage from black bears (Ursus americanus). We assessed the relative influence of beliefs and attitudes toward bears and bear proofing, perceived behavioral control, perceived risks and benefits assigned to bears, norms, trust in management, previous experience with conflicts, and demographics on compliance behavior (i.e., bear proofing). Data on previous experience were obtained through direct observation and survey reports. We found that higher compliance rates were associated with more observed conflicts on a respondent's block. Counter to expectations, however, residents were less compliant when they were more trusting of the management agency and perceived more benefits from bears. We suggest that messages have the potential to increase compliance when they empower residents by linking successful management of conflicts to individual actions and emphasize how reducing conflicts could maintain benefits provided by wildlife. Modifying existing educational materials to account for these psychological considerations and evaluating their impact on compliance behavior over time are important next steps in changing human behaviors relevant to the globally important problem of human-wildlife conflict 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Colorado 
650 4 |a behavior change 
650 4 |a black bears 
650 4 |a compliance 
650 4 |a human-black bear conflict 
650 4 |a pro-environmental behavior 
650 4 |a  黑熊 
650 4 |a 人类与黑熊的冲突 
650 4 |a 服从性 
650 4 |a 环保行为 
650 4 |a 科罗拉多 
650 4 |a 行为改变 
700 1 |a Teel, Tara L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Johnson, Heather E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Larson, Courtney  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Breck, Stewart  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Crooks, Kevin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 34(2020), 6 vom: 16. Dez., Seite 1383-1392  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:6  |g day:16  |g month:12  |g pages:1383-1392 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13626  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 34  |j 2020  |e 6  |b 16  |c 12  |h 1383-1392