First Report of Black Spot Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum on Sisal in Guangxi, China

Sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) is an important hard fiber crop that is widely planted in Guangxi, Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan, and Fujian provinces, China. In July 2019, a new leaf disease of sisal with a disease incident of about 36% was found in Guangxi (Fig.1a~d). The oval or circular black lesions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - (2020) vom: 19. Okt.
1. Verfasser: Xie, Hong-Hui (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Long, Lingyun, Huang, SuiPing, Mao, Liyan, Huang, Qiuwei, Wang, Liping, Li, Juxin
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article Causal Agent EF1-α Fungi ITS Neoscytalidium dimidiatum sisal β-tubulin
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM316434760
003 DE-627
005 20240229142921.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1669-PDN  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1303.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM316434760 
035 |a (NLM)33074071 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Xie, Hong-Hui  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a First Report of Black Spot Caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum on Sisal in Guangxi, China 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 22.02.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status Publisher 
520 |a Sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) is an important hard fiber crop that is widely planted in Guangxi, Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan, and Fujian provinces, China. In July 2019, a new leaf disease of sisal with a disease incident of about 36% was found in Guangxi (Fig.1a~d). The oval or circular black lesions were 2.3 cm to 15.9 cm in length and 1.6 cm to 5.5 cm in width on both sides of the diseased leaves. The central part of the lesions was slightly hollow. The lesions continuously enlarged and ultimately penetrated the leaves. Reddish brown and dark mucus was secreted from the lesions. The junction of lesions and healthy parts was reddish brown to yellow. The diseased leaf fiber and mesophyll tissues were reddish brown and necrotic. Fresh leaf yield was reduced about 30% by the disease, and fiber quality was significantly compromised every year in Guangxi. Six kinds of fungi distinguished by their morphology, size and color of the colonies were isolated from diseased leaf tissues of 60 sisal plants sampled from five different farms in Guangxi. Isolate JMHB1 was isolated at a rate of 95.67%. The isolate JMHB1 was initially white with dense and hairy aerial mycelium, gradually turning dark grey to olive green on PDA (Fig. 2). Conidia, arthrospores, and chlamydospores were observed on PDA in culture (Fig. 3). The conidia formed arthric chains, disarticulating, cylindrical-truncate, oblong-obtuse to doliiform, colorless and transparent, zero- to one-septate, and averaging 4.4 to 13.8 µm × 2.2 to 5.6 µm (n=100). Arthrospores were short columnar, pigmented and transparent, single or formed arthric chains, averaging 5.5 to 17.9 µm × 2.1 to 3.5 µm (n=100). Chlamydospores were dark brown, round or oval, averaging 4.5 to 9.6 µm × 4.5 to 8.6 µm (n=100). Pathogenicity testing was conducted by inoculating 3-year-old healthy sisal plants with PDA plugs (5 × 5 mm) on which the fungus had grown for 5 days. Nine healthy plants were wounded on the leaves with a sterile needle, and mycelial plugs were placed on the wounds, covered with sterile moist cotton, and wrapped with parafilm. Nine control plants were wounded and treated with PDA plugs as the negative control. The test was repeated three times. All treated plants were kept in a greenhouse at ~28 ℃ and 40% RH. After 5 days, only leaves inoculated with isolate JMHB1 showed lesions similar to symptoms observed in the field (Fig.1e~f). The fungus was re-isolated from all nine diseased plants, and no symptoms were observed on the leaves of control plants. Molecular identification of the fungus was made by PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA, EF1-α gene and β-tubulin gene using primers ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), EFl-728F/EF1-986R (Carbone and Kohn 1999), TUB2Fd/TUB4Rd (Aveskamp et al. 2009) respectively. The ITS (MT705646), EF1-α (MT733516) and β-tubulin (MT773603) sequences of JMHB1 were similar to the ITS (AY819727), EF1-α (EU144063) and β-tubulin (KF531800) sequences of the epitype of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum (CBS 499.66) with 100%, 99.65% and 99.02% identity, respectively. Based on pathogenicity testing, morphological characteristics, and molecular identification, the pathogen of sisal causing black spot was identified as N. dimidiatum (Penz.) Crous & Slippers (Crous et al. 2006). To our knowledge, this is the first report of black spot caused by N. dimidiatum on sisal in China. Sisal is the main economic crop in arid and semi-arid areas that is widely planted in several provinces of southern China. The serious occurrence of the disease caused by N. dimidiatum has greatly affected the development of sisal industry and local economic income in China. Identification of the pathogen of the disease is of great significance to guide disease control, increase farmers' income and promote the development of sisal industry. References: Aveskamp, M. M., et al. 2009. Mycologia, 101: 363. https://doi.org/10.3852/08-199. Carbone, I., and Kohn, L. M. 1999. Mycologia, 91:553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1999. 12061051. Crous, P. W., et al. 2006. Stud. Mycol. 55:235. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.55.1.235. White, T. J., et al. 1990. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, Page 315. doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080280418. Supplemental photographs: Fig. 1 Symptoms of sisal black spot disease a, b, c, d showed symptoms in the field, e and f were symptoms after inoculating Neoscytalidium dimidiatum JMHB1. a, c, and e were the front of the lesions, b, d, and f were the back of the lesions. Fig. 2 Primary colony (a) and old colony (b) of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum JMHB1 Fig. 3 Arthrospores (a), conidia and chlamydospores (b) of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum JMHB1 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Causal Agent 
650 4 |a EF1-α 
650 4 |a Fungi 
650 4 |a ITS 
650 4 |a Neoscytalidium dimidiatum 
650 4 |a sisal 
650 4 |a β-tubulin 
700 1 |a Long, Lingyun  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Huang, SuiPing  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mao, Liyan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Huang, Qiuwei  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wang, Liping  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Li, Juxin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g (2020) vom: 19. Okt.  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2020  |g day:19  |g month:10 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1669-PDN  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2020  |b 19  |c 10