Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings

© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 35(2021), 3 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 804-815
1. Verfasser: Buchs, Arnaud (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Hassenforder, Emeline, Meinard, Yves
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't acción de conservación conservation action decision making deliberación deliberation economía institucional institutional economics justificación mehr... justification participación participation pluralismo de valores toma de decisiones value pluralism
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM31614570X
003 DE-627
005 20231225160439.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13654  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1053.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM31614570X 
035 |a (NLM)33044786 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Buchs, Arnaud  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adapting participatory processes to fine-tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 24.06.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 03.07.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked-in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a acción de conservación 
650 4 |a conservation action 
650 4 |a decision making 
650 4 |a deliberación 
650 4 |a deliberation 
650 4 |a economía institucional 
650 4 |a institutional economics 
650 4 |a justificación 
650 4 |a justification 
650 4 |a participación 
650 4 |a participation 
650 4 |a pluralismo de valores 
650 4 |a toma de decisiones 
650 4 |a value pluralism 
700 1 |a Hassenforder, Emeline  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Meinard, Yves  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 35(2021), 3 vom: 25. Juni, Seite 804-815  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g day:25  |g month:06  |g pages:804-815 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13654  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 35  |j 2021  |e 3  |b 25  |c 06  |h 804-815