Approaches to interdisciplinary mixed methods research in land-change science and environmental management

© 2020 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 35(2021), 1 vom: 30. Feb., Seite 130-141
1. Verfasser: Kinnebrew, Eva (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Shoffner, Elizabeth, Farah-Pérez, Aldo, Mills-Novoa, Megan, Siegel, Katherine
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review data relationships integración integration investigación socioambiental iteración iteration métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos mehr... qualitative and quantitative methods relaciones entre datos socioenvironmental research
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM315495480
003 DE-627
005 20250228022125.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13642  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1051.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM315495480 
035 |a (NLM)32978823 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kinnebrew, Eva  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Approaches to interdisciplinary mixed methods research in land-change science and environmental management 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.04.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 26.04.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Combining qualitative and quantitative methods and data is crucial to understanding the complex dynamics and often interdisciplinary nature of conservation. Many conservation scientists use mixed methods, but there are a variety of mixed methods approaches, a lack of shared vocabulary, and few methodological frameworks. We reviewed articles from 2 conservation-related fields that often incorporate qualitative and quantitative methods: land-change science (n = 16) and environmental management (n = 16). We examined how authors of these studies approached mixed methods research by coding key methodological characteristics, including relationships between method objectives, extent of integration, iterative interactions between methods, and justification for use of mixed methods. Using these characteristics, we created a typology with the goal of improving understanding of how researchers studying land-change science and environmental management approach interdisciplinary mixed methods research. We identified 5 types of mixed methods approaches, which we termed simple nested, informed nested, simple parallel, unidirectional synthesis, and bidirectional synthesis. Methods and data sources were often used to address different research questions within a project, and only around half of the reviewed papers methodologically integrated different forms of data. Most authors used one method to inform the other, rather than both informing one another. Very few articles used methodological iteration. Each methodological type has certain epistemological implications, such as the disciplinary reach of the research and the capacity for knowledge creation through the exchange of information between distinct methodologies. To exemplify a research design that can lead to multidimensional knowledge production, we provide a methodological framework that bidirectionally integrates and iterates qualitative and quantitative methods 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a data relationships 
650 4 |a integración 
650 4 |a integration 
650 4 |a investigación socioambiental 
650 4 |a iteración 
650 4 |a iteration 
650 4 |a métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos 
650 4 |a qualitative and quantitative methods 
650 4 |a relaciones entre datos 
650 4 |a socioenvironmental research 
700 1 |a Shoffner, Elizabeth  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Farah-Pérez, Aldo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mills-Novoa, Megan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Siegel, Katherine  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 35(2021), 1 vom: 30. Feb., Seite 130-141  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g day:30  |g month:02  |g pages:130-141 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13642  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 35  |j 2021  |e 1  |b 30  |c 02  |h 130-141