LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM314250239
003 DE-627
005 20231225152327.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/gcb.15280  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1047.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM314250239 
035 |a (NLM)32851731 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Booy, Olaf  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Using structured eradication feasibility assessment to prioritize the management of new and emerging invasive alien species in Europe 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 14.04.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 14.04.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
520 |a Prioritizing the management of invasive alien species (IAS) is of global importance and within Europe integral to the EU IAS regulation. To prioritize management effectively, the risks posed by IAS need to be assessed, but so too does the feasibility of their management. While the risk of IAS to the EU has been assessed, the feasibility of management has not. We assessed the feasibility of eradicating 60 new (not yet established) and 35 emerging (established with limited distribution) species that pose a threat to the EU, as identified by horizon scanning. The assessment was carried out by 34 experts in invasion management from across Europe, applying the Non-Native Risk Management scheme to defined invasion scenarios and eradication strategies for each species, assessing the feasibility of eradication using seven key risk management criteria. Management priorities were identified by combining scores for risk (derived from horizon scanning) and feasibility of eradication. The results show eradication feasibility score and risk score were not correlated, indicating that risk management criteria evaluate different information than risk assessment. In all, 17 new species were identified as particularly high priorities for eradication should they establish in the future, whereas 14 emerging species were identified as priorities for eradication now. A number of species considered highest priority for eradication were terrestrial vertebrates, a group that has been the focus of a number of eradication attempts in Europe. However, eradication priorities also included a diverse range of other taxa (plants, invertebrates and fish) suggesting there is scope to broaden the taxonomic range of attempted eradication in Europe. We demonstrate that broad scale structured assessments of management feasibility can help prioritize IAS for management. Such frameworks are needed to support evidence-based decision-making 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a NNRM 
650 4 |a contingency planning 
650 4 |a invasive non-native species 
650 4 |a long-term management 
650 4 |a management prioritisation 
650 4 |a prevention 
650 4 |a risk analysis 
650 4 |a risk management 
700 1 |a Robertson, Pete A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moore, Niall  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ward, Jess  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roy, Helen E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Adriaens, Tim  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shaw, Richard  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Van Valkenburg, Johan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wyn, Gabrielle  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bertolino, Sandro  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Blight, Olivier  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Branquart, Etienne  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brundu, Giuseppe  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Caffrey, Joe  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Capizzi, Dario  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Casaer, Jim  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a De Clerck, Olivier  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Coughlan, Neil E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Davis, Eithne  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dick, Jaimie T A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Essl, Franz  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fried, Guillaume  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Genovesi, Piero  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a González-Moreno, Pablo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Huysentruyt, Frank  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jenkins, Stuart R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kerckhof, Francis  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lucy, Frances E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nentwig, Wolfgang  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Newman, Jonathan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rabitsch, Wolfgang  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roy, Sugoto  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Starfinger, Uwe  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stebbing, Paul D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stuyck, Jan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sutton-Croft, Mike  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tricarico, Elena  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vanderhoeven, Sonia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Verreycken, Hugo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mill, Aileen C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Global change biology  |d 1999  |g 26(2020), 11 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 6235-6250  |w (DE-627)NLM098239996  |x 1365-2486  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2020  |g number:11  |g day:18  |g month:11  |g pages:6235-6250 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15280  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 26  |j 2020  |e 11  |b 18  |c 11  |h 6235-6250