LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM313367442
003 DE-627
005 20250227180130.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13602  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1044.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM313367442 
035 |a (NLM)32761662 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Hanson, Jeffrey O  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluating surrogates of genetic diversity for conservation planning 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.04.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 31.03.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Protected-area systems should conserve intraspecific genetic diversity. Because genetic data require resources to obtain, several approaches have been proposed for generating plans for protected-area systems (prioritizations) when genetic data are not available. Yet such surrogate-based approaches remain poorly tested. We evaluated the effectiveness of potential surrogate-based approaches based on microsatellite genetic data collected across the Iberian Peninsula for 7 amphibian and 3 reptilian species. Long-term environmental suitability did not effectively represent sites containing high genetic diversity (allelic richness). Prioritizations based on long-term environmental suitability had similar performance to random prioritizations. Geographic distances and resistance distances based on contemporary environmental suitability were not always effective surrogates for identification of combinations of sites that contain individuals with different genetic compositions. Our results demonstrate that population genetic data based on commonly used neutral markers can inform prioritizations, and we could not find an adequate substitute. Conservation planners need to weigh the potential benefits of genetic data against their acquisition costs 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a allelic richness 
650 4 |a evolutionary processes 
650 4 |a microsatellites 
650 4 |a microsatélites 
650 4 |a planeación sistemática de la conservación 
650 4 |a prioritization 
650 4 |a priorización 
650 4 |a procesos evolutivos 
650 4 |a protected-area systems 
650 4 |a refugia 
650 4 |a refugios 
650 4 |a reserve selection 
650 4 |a riqueza de alelos 
650 4 |a selección de reservas 
650 4 |a sistemas de áreas protegidas 
650 4 |a systematic conservation planning 
650 4 |a 优先次序 
650 4 |a 保护区系统 
650 4 |a 保护区选择 
650 4 |a 微卫星 
650 4 |a 演化过程 
650 4 |a 等位基因丰度 
650 4 |a 系统保护规划 
650 4 |a 避难所 
700 1 |a Veríssimo, Ana  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Velo-Antón, Guillermo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Marques, Adam  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Camacho-Sanchez, Miguel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Martínez-Solano, Íñigo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gonçalves, Helena  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sequeira, Fernando  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Possingham, Hugh P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Carvalho, Silvia B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 35(2021), 2 vom: 20. Apr., Seite 634-642  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g day:20  |g month:04  |g pages:634-642 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13602  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 35  |j 2021  |e 2  |b 20  |c 04  |h 634-642