Codependency between plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities : what is the evidence?

© 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 228(2020), 3 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 828-838
1. Verfasser: Kokkoris, Vasilis (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Lekberg, Ylva, Antunes, Pedro M, Fahey, Catherine, Fordyce, James A, Kivlin, Stephanie N, Hart, Miranda M
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Review arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) codependency covariation environmental filters fungal community plant community unexplained variation
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM310341787
003 DE-627
005 20231225135903.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.16676  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1034.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM310341787 
035 |a (NLM)32452032 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kokkoris, Vasilis  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Codependency between plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities  |b what is the evidence? 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 14.05.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 14.05.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a That arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi covary with plant communities is clear, and many papers report nonrandom associations between symbiotic partners. However, these studies do not test the causal relationship, or 'codependency', whereby the composition of one guild affects the composition of the other. Here we outline underlying requirements for codependency, compare important drivers for both plant and AM fungal communities, and assess how host preference - a pre-requisite for codependency - changes across spatiotemporal scales and taxonomic resolution for both plants and AM fungi. We find few examples in the literature designed to test for codependency and those that do have been conducted within plots or mesocosms. Also, while plants and AM fungi respond similarly to coarse environmental filters, most variation remains unexplained, with host identity explaining less than 30% of the variation in AM fungal communities. These results combined question the likelihood of predictable co-occurrence, and therefore evolution of codependency, between plant and AM fungal taxa across locations. We argue that codependency is most likely to occur in homogeneous environments where specific plant - AM fungal pairings have functional consequences for the symbiosis. We end by outlining critical aspects to consider moving forward 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) 
650 4 |a codependency 
650 4 |a covariation 
650 4 |a environmental filters 
650 4 |a fungal community 
650 4 |a plant community 
650 4 |a unexplained variation 
700 1 |a Lekberg, Ylva  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Antunes, Pedro M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fahey, Catherine  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fordyce, James A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kivlin, Stephanie N  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hart, Miranda M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1979  |g 228(2020), 3 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 828-838  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:228  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g day:15  |g month:11  |g pages:828-838 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16676  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 228  |j 2020  |e 3  |b 15  |c 11  |h 828-838