LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM309898099
003 DE-627
005 20231225134921.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13469  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1032.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM309898099 
035 |a (NLM)32406970 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Wilkinson, Christine E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 3 |a An ecological framework for contextualizing carnivore-livestock conflict 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.10.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 26.10.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Carnivore predation on livestock is a complex management and policy challenge, yet it is also intrinsically an ecological interaction between predators and prey. Human-wildlife interactions occur in socioecological systems in which human and environmental processes are closely linked. However, underlying human-wildlife conflict and key to unpacking its complexity are concrete and identifiable ecological mechanisms that lead to predation events. To better understand how ecological theory accords with interactions between wild predators and domestic prey, we developed a framework to describe ecological drivers of predation on livestock. We based this framework on foundational ecological theory and current research on interactions between predators and domestic prey. We used this framework to examine ecological mechanisms (e.g., density-mediated effects, behaviorally mediated effects, and optimal foraging theory) through which specific management interventions operate, and we analyzed the ecological determinants of failure and success of management interventions in 3 case studies: snow leopards (Panthera uncia), wolves (Canis lupus), and cougars (Puma concolor). The varied, context-dependent successes and failures of the management interventions in these case studies demonstrated the utility of using an ecological framework to ground research and management of carnivore-livestock conflict. Mitigation of human-wildlife conflict appears to require an understanding of how fundamental ecological theories work within domestic predator-prey systems 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a carnivore 
650 4 |a carnívoro 
650 4 |a conflict management 
650 4 |a conflicto humano - fauna 
650 4 |a ecological theory 
650 4 |a ganado 
650 4 |a human-wildlife conflict 
650 4 |a livestock 
650 4 |a manejo de conflictos 
650 4 |a teoría ecológica 
650 4 |a 人兽冲突 
650 4 |a 冲突管理 
650 4 |a 家畜 
650 4 |a 生态学理论 
650 4 |a 食肉动物 
700 1 |a McInturff, Alex  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Miller, Jennifer R B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yovovich, Veronica  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gaynor, Kaitlyn M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Calhoun, Kendall  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Karandikar, Harshad  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Martin, Jeff Vance  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Parker-Shames, Phoebe  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shawler, Avery  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Van Scoyoc, Amy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brashares, Justin S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 34(2020), 4 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 854-867  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:4  |g day:01  |g month:08  |g pages:854-867 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13469  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 34  |j 2020  |e 4  |b 01  |c 08  |h 854-867