Conventional Microscope-Integrated Intraoperative OCT Versus Digitally Enabled Intraoperative OCT in Vitreoretinal Surgery in the DISCOVER Study
Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 51(2020), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite S37-S43 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
| Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Video-Audio Media |
| Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) and digitally enabled microscope-integrated iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of the DISCOVER prospective iOCT study, two surgical groups were compared: (1) conventional iOCT and (2) digitally enabled iOCT. Surgeon questionnaires were collected immediately following surgery RESULTS: A total of 187 subjects were included in the study: 91 in the conventional iOCT group and 96 in the digitally enabled iOCT group. There were no differences in surgeon-perceived iOCT utility between the two groups. There was significantly higher surgical field-based visualization of the iOCT datastream in the digitally enabled iOCT group (67.7% vs. 3.3%; P < .0001). Reported significant back discomfort (1.0% vs. 18.7%; P < .0001) and headaches (5.2% vs. 20.9%; P < .002) were lower in the digitally enabled iOCT group CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility and utility of iOCT were similar in both groups. Digitally enabled iOCT datastream enabled increased attention on the surgical field during OCT review. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S37-S43.] |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 14.04.2021 Date Revised 10.09.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
| DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20200401-05 |