Limitations, lack of standardization, and recommended best practices in studies of renewable energy effects on birds and bats

© 2020 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 35(2021), 1 vom: 15. Feb., Seite 64-76
1. Verfasser: Conkling, Tara J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Loss, Scott R, Diffendorfer, Jay E, Duerr, Adam E, Katzner, Todd E
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Review best practices diseño experimental energía eólica energía renovable energía solar experimental design mehr... mejores prácticas monitoreo de fauna mortalidad mortality renewable energy sampling bias sesgo de muestreo solar energy wildlife monitoring wind energy 可再生能源 太阳能 实验设计 最佳实践 死亡率 采样偏差 野生动物监测 风能
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM305128841
003 DE-627
005 20231225120513.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13457  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1017.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM305128841 
035 |a (NLM)31913528 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Conkling, Tara J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Limitations, lack of standardization, and recommended best practices in studies of renewable energy effects on birds and bats 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.04.2021 
500 |a Date Revised 26.04.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2020 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Increasing global energy demand is fostering the development of renewable energy as an alternative to fossil fuels. However, renewable energy facilities may adversely affect wildlife. Facility siting guidelines recommend or require project developers complete pre- and postconstruction wildlife surveys to predict risk and estimate effects of proposed projects. Despite this, there are no published studies that have quantified the types of surveys used or how survey types are standardized within and across facilities. We evaluated 628 peer-reviewed publications, unpublished reports, and citations, and we analyzed data from 525 of these sources (203 facilities: 193 wind and 10 solar) in the United States and Canada to determine the frequency of pre- and postconstruction surveys and whether that frequency changed over time; frequency of studies explicitly designed to allow before-after or impact-control analyses; and what types of survey data were collected during pre- and postconstruction periods and how those data types were standardized across periods and among facilities. Within our data set, postconstruction monitoring for wildlife fatalities and habitat use was a standard practice (n = 446 reports), but preconstruction estimation of baseline wildlife habitat use and mortality was less frequently reported (n = 84). Only 22% (n = 45) of the 203 facilities provided data from both pre- and postconstruction, and 29% (n = 59) had experimental study designs. Of 108 facilities at which habitat-use surveys were conducted, only 3% estimated of detection probability. Thus, the available data generally preclude comparison of biological data across construction periods and among facilities. Use of experimental study designs and following similar field protocols would improve the knowledge of how renewable energy affects wildlife. Article Impact Statement Many surveys at wind and solar facilities provide limited information on wildlife use and fatality rates 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a best practices 
650 4 |a diseño experimental 
650 4 |a energía eólica 
650 4 |a energía renovable 
650 4 |a energía solar 
650 4 |a experimental design 
650 4 |a mejores prácticas 
650 4 |a monitoreo de fauna 
650 4 |a mortalidad 
650 4 |a mortality 
650 4 |a renewable energy 
650 4 |a sampling bias 
650 4 |a sesgo de muestreo 
650 4 |a solar energy 
650 4 |a wildlife monitoring 
650 4 |a wind energy 
650 4 |a 可再生能源 
650 4 |a 太阳能 
650 4 |a 实验设计 
650 4 |a 最佳实践 
650 4 |a 死亡率 
650 4 |a 采样偏差 
650 4 |a 野生动物监测 
650 4 |a 风能 
700 1 |a Loss, Scott R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Diffendorfer, Jay E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Duerr, Adam E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Katzner, Todd E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 35(2021), 1 vom: 15. Feb., Seite 64-76  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g day:15  |g month:02  |g pages:64-76 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13457  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 35  |j 2021  |e 1  |b 15  |c 02  |h 64-76