Viability determination of Ascaris ova in raw wastewater : a comparative evaluation of culture-based, BacLight Live/Dead staining and PMA-qPCR methods

Accurate evaluation of viable Ascaris ova in wastewater is the key to mitigating Ascaris reinfections in endemic regions. In this study, the viability of Ascaris ova in raw wastewater was determined using three different detection methods: culture-based, BacLight Live/Dead staining and propidium mon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 80(2019), 5 vom: 13. Sept., Seite 817-826
1. Verfasser: Ravindran, Vivek B (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Shahsavari, Esmaeil, Soni, Sarvesh K, Ball, Andrew S
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Schlagworte:Journal Article Azides Waste Water Propidium 36015-30-2
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM303496916
003 DE-627
005 20231225112940.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2166/wst.2019.286  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1011.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM303496916 
035 |a (NLM)31746788 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ravindran, Vivek B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Viability determination of Ascaris ova in raw wastewater  |b a comparative evaluation of culture-based, BacLight Live/Dead staining and PMA-qPCR methods 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 21.11.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Accurate evaluation of viable Ascaris ova in wastewater is the key to mitigating Ascaris reinfections in endemic regions. In this study, the viability of Ascaris ova in raw wastewater was determined using three different detection methods: culture-based, BacLight Live/Dead staining and propidium monoazide-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR). Furthermore, comparative assessment of viability utilising the aforementioned detection methods was performed using seeded experiments in wastewater. The percentage of viability was: culture-based (82%), BacLight Live/Dead staining (87%) and PMA-qPCR (85%) respectively. Despite the fact that no statistical difference was shown in the viability determination among the three methods, PMA-qPCR-based viability determination would be preferable over the other two methods for evaluating potential public health risks with A. suum ova due to its accuracy, being least subjective and its rapid reaction time 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 7 |a Azides  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Waste Water  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Propidium  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 36015-30-2  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Shahsavari, Esmaeil  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Soni, Sarvesh K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ball, Andrew S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research  |d 1986  |g 80(2019), 5 vom: 13. Sept., Seite 817-826  |w (DE-627)NLM098149431  |x 0273-1223  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:80  |g year:2019  |g number:5  |g day:13  |g month:09  |g pages:817-826 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.286  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 80  |j 2019  |e 5  |b 13  |c 09  |h 817-826