Understanding plant communities of the future requires filling knowledge gaps
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
| Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology. - 1999. - 26(2020), 2 vom: 20. Feb., Seite 328-329 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Global change biology |
| Schlagworte: | Letter Comment |
| Zusammenfassung: | © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. In their response to our letter, De Boek et al. (2019) and Muller, Ballhausen, Lakovic, and Rillig (2019) argue that our conclusion that we need more realistic climate change experiments is too "gloomy" and that we need a plurality of experiments including extremes and multifactorial approaches. We agree that a diversity of experimental approaches is required in order to anticipate the consequences for plant communities of alternative future environmental conditions. However, we argue that "realistic" experiments are underrepresented in the portfolio of previous experiments, and are urgently needed to understand how species communities of the future will look like and how they will function. This article is a response to Muller et al., 26, e4-e5 and De Boeck et al., 26, e6-e7 |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 16.03.2020 Date Revised 16.03.2020 published: Print-Electronic CommentOn: Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb;26(2):325-327. - PMID 31412141 Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1365-2486 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/gcb.14920 |