Use of surrogate species to cost-effectively prioritize conservation actions

© 2019 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 34(2020), 3 vom: 30. Juni, Seite 600-610
1. Verfasser: Ward, Michelle (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rhodes, Jonathan R, Watson, James E M, Lefevre, James, Atkinson, Scott, Possingham, Hugh P
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't análisis rentable atajos de conservación conservation planning conservation shortcuts cost-effective analysis especies amenazadas especies paraguas manejo de amenazas mehr... planeación de la conservación prioritization priorización surrogacy sustitución threat management threatened species umbrella species 优先保护 伞护种 保护的捷径 保护规划 受胁迫物种 威胁管理 成本效益分析 替代物种
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2019 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Conservation efforts often focus on umbrella species whose distributions overlap with many other flora and fauna. However, because biodiversity is affected by different threats that are spatially variable, focusing only on the geographic range overlap of species may not be sufficient in allocating the necessary actions needed to efficiently abate threats. We developed a problem-based method for prioritizing conservation actions for umbrella species that maximizes the total number of flora and fauna benefiting from management while considering threats, actions, and costs. We tested our new method by assessing the performance of the Australian federal government's umbrella prioritization list, which identifies 73 umbrella species as priorities for conservation attention. Our results show that the federal government priority list benefits only 6% of all Australia's threatened terrestrial species. This could be increased to benefit nearly half (or 46%) of all threatened terrestrial species for the same budget of AU$550 million/year if more suitable umbrella species were chosen. This results in a 7-fold increase in management efficiency. We believe nations around the world can markedly improve the selection of prioritized umbrella species for conservation action with this transparent, quantitative, and objective prioritization approach
Beschreibung:Date Completed 26.10.2020
Date Revised 26.10.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13430