Influence of five-in-one management mode on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma

Objective: To investigate the influence of five-in-one management mode(standardized asthma treatment, asthma diary, peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring, reasonable diet and physical exercise) on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma. Methods: From April to October 2018, 70...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics. - 1960. - 57(2019), 11 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 870-875
1. Verfasser: Lu, L (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Lin, R J, Guan, R Z, Liu, Y J, Wang, X Y
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:Chinese
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics
Schlagworte:Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Asthma Child Disease management
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM302703454
003 DE-627
005 20231225111258.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c
024 7 |a 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.11.011  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1008.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM302703454 
035 |a (NLM)31665842 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a chi 
100 1 |a Lu, L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Influence of five-in-one management mode on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 12.11.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 08.01.2020 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Objective: To investigate the influence of five-in-one management mode(standardized asthma treatment, asthma diary, peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring, reasonable diet and physical exercise) on disease prevention and control of school children with asthma. Methods: From April to October 2018, 70 children with asthma in clinical remission were selected from Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University using randomized controlled study design. These children were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 35 cases in each group. In the study group, 5 cases were lost to follow-up, and 30 cases were actually enrolled. In the control group, 6 cases were lost to follow-up, and 29 cases were actually enrolled. Children in the control group received routine medication and regular outpatient consultation, and children in the study group received the five-in-one asthma management model. In the first time of seeing a doctor, after 3 months and 6 months of follow-up, asthma control test score, medication compliance index score and lung function index (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), PEF were evaluated respectively.Parental satisfaction, asthma acute episodes, weight, height and biochemical index were recorded during the 6 months of follow-up. Pulmonary function index, asthma control score and body mass index of overweight children with asthma were compared with t-test, medication compliance was compared with chi-square test, and the rank sum test was used for the comparison of the number of emergency visits of asthma attacks and parents' satisfaction. Results: A total of 59 children with asthma were included, among them 30 were in the study group (8.1±1.5) years old and 29 in the control group (9.2±1.1) years old. After 3 months of follow-up, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score in the study group were (86.3±1.5)%, (83.3±2.4)%, (24.7±2.6) points respectively; and in the control group, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score were (84.4±2.5)%, (82.2±1.9)%, (21.1±1.3) points respectively. The indicators in the study group were higher than those in the control group (t=3.62, 1.97, 6.64, P<0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score in the study group were (88.4±2.3)%, (85.4±2.2)%, (26.8±1.8) points respectively; and in the control group, FEV1, PEF, asthma control score were (85.5±1.9)%, (83.2±1.7)%, (22.5±1.4) points respectively. The indicators in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (t=5.34, 4.24, 10.41, P<0.05). During the 6-month follow up, the number of emergency visits of asthma attacks in the study group and in the control group were 0.42(0.36, 0.51) and 0.92(0.72, 1.27) respectively. The indicator in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Z=3.21, P<0.05). After 3 months of follow-up, the proportions of children with good compliance in the study group and control group were 67% (20/30) and 62% (18/29), the proportions of poor compliance were 27% (8/30) and 34% (10/29), the proportions of non-compliance were 7% (2/30) and 7% (2/29). There were no statistically significant differences (χ(2)=0.14, 0.43, 0.00, P=0.71, 0.51, 0.97). After 6 months of follow-up, the proportions of children with good compliance in the study group and control group were 87% (26/30) and 69% (20/29), the proportion of poor compliance were 10% (3/30) and 28% (8/29), the proportion of non-compliance were 3% (1/30) and 7% (2/29), There were no statistically significant differences (χ(2)=2.70, 3.00, 0.39, P=0.10, 0.08, 0.53). After 6 months of follow-up, the number of great satisfaction, satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the study group were 20, 10 and 0 respectively, the satisfaction rate was 100%, meanwhile those indicators in the control group were 4, 15 and 10 respectively, the satisfaction rate was 66%, The indicator in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (Z=4.60, P<0.05). Conclusions: The application of "five-in-one" asthma management model (standardized asthma treatment, asthma diary, PEF monitoring, reasonable diet and physical exercise) for school-age children with asthma can significantly improve lung function, as well as reduce the number of acute asthma attacks. It has a high parent satisfaction, therefore it should be recommended for clinical implementation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Randomized Controlled Trial 
650 4 |a Asthma 
650 4 |a Child 
650 4 |a Disease management 
700 1 |a Lin, R J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Guan, R Z  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Liu, Y J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wang, X Y  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics  |d 1960  |g 57(2019), 11 vom: 02. Nov., Seite 870-875  |w (DE-627)NLM136249191  |x 0578-1310  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2019  |g number:11  |g day:02  |g month:11  |g pages:870-875 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.11.011  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_244 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_294 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_665 
912 |a GBV_ILN_813 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 57  |j 2019  |e 11  |b 02  |c 11  |h 870-875