LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM302283196
003 DE-627
005 20231225110408.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13425  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1007.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM302283196 
035 |a (NLM)31621946 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Akçakaya, H Resit  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Assessing ecological function in the context of species recovery 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.10.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 26.10.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Species interactions matter to conservation. Setting an ambitious recovery target for a species requires considering the size, density, and demographic structure of its populations such that they fulfill the interactions, roles, and functions of the species in the ecosystems in which they are embedded. A recently proposed framework for an International Union for Conservation of Nature Green List of Species formalizes this requirement by defining a fully recovered species in terms of representation, viability, and functionality. Defining and quantifying ecological function from the viewpoint of species recovery is challenging in concept and application, but also an opportunity to insert ecological theory into conservation practice. We propose 2 complementary approaches to assessing a species' ecological functions: confirmation (listing interactions of the species, identifying ecological processes and other species involved in these interactions, and quantifying the extent to which the species contributes to the identified ecological process) and elimination (inferring functionality by ruling out symptoms of reduced functionality, analogous to the red-list approach that focuses on symptoms of reduced viability). Despite the challenges, incorporation of functionality into species recovery planning is possible in most cases and it is essential to a conservation vision that goes beyond preventing extinctions and aims to restore a species to levels beyond what is required for its viability. This vision focuses on conservation and recovery at the species level and sees species as embedded in ecosystems, influencing and being influenced by the processes in those ecosystems. Thus, it connects and integrates conservation at the species and ecosystem levels 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a conservation impact 
650 4 |a conservation optimism 
650 4 |a conservation planning 
650 4 |a green list of species 
650 4 |a impacto de la conservación 
650 4 |a lista verde de especies 
650 4 |a optimismo en la conservación 
650 4 |a planificación de la conservación 
650 4 |a recuperación de especies 
650 4 |a species recovery 
650 4 |a 保护乐观主义 
650 4 |a 保护成效 
650 4 |a 保护规划 
650 4 |a 物种恢复 
650 4 |a 物种绿色名录 
700 1 |a Rodrigues, Ana S L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Keith, David A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Milner-Gulland, E J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sanderson, Eric W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hedges, Simon  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mallon, David P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Grace, Molly K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Long, Barney  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Meijaard, Erik  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stephenson, P J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 34(2020), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 561-571  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g day:20  |g month:06  |g pages:561-571 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13425  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 34  |j 2020  |e 3  |b 20  |c 06  |h 561-571