Comparative study on the pyrolysis kinetics of polyurethane foam from waste refrigerators

Thermal treatment offers advantages of significant volume reduction and energy recovery for the polyurethane foam from waste refrigerators. In this work, the pyrolysis kinetics of polyurethane foam was investigated using the model-fitting, model-free and distributed activation energy model methods....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA. - 1991. - 38(2020), 3 vom: 15. März, Seite 271-278
1. Verfasser: Yao, Zhitong (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Yu, Shaoqi, Su, Weiping, Wu, Weihong, Tang, Junhong, Qi, Wei
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
Schlagworte:Journal Article Polyurethane foam distributed activation energy model electronic waste model-fitting and -free method pyrolysis kinetics Polyurethanes polyurethane foam 9009-54-5
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Thermal treatment offers advantages of significant volume reduction and energy recovery for the polyurethane foam from waste refrigerators. In this work, the pyrolysis kinetics of polyurethane foam was investigated using the model-fitting, model-free and distributed activation energy model methods. The thermogravimetric analysis indicated that the polyurethane foam decomposition could be divided into three stages with temperatures of 38°C-400°C, 400°C-550°C and 550°C-1000°C. Peak temperatures for the major decomposition stage (<400°C) were determined as 324°C, 342°C and 344°C for heating rates of 5, 15 and 25 K min-1, respectively. The activation energy (Eα) from the Friedman, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and Tang methods increased with degree of conversion (α) in the range of 0.05 to 0.5. The coefficients from the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method were larger and the resulted Eα values fell into the range of 163.980-328.190 kJ mol-1 with an average of 206.099 kJ mol-1. For the Coats-Redfern method, the diffusion models offered higher coefficients, but the E values were smaller than that from the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method. The Eα values derived from the distributed activation energy model method were determined as 163.536-334.231 kJ mol-1, with an average of 206.799 kJ mol-1. The peak of activation energy distribution curve was located at 205.929 kJ mol-1, consistent with the thermogravimetric results. The Flynn-Wall-Ozawa and distributed activation energy model methods were more reliable for describing the polyurethane foam pyrolysis process
Beschreibung:Date Completed 17.02.2020
Date Revised 17.02.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1096-3669
DOI:10.1177/0734242X19877682