Comparison Between Ultra-Widefield Pseudocolor Imaging and Indirect Ophthalmoscopy in the Detection of Peripheral Retinal Lesions
Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 50(2019), 9 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 544-549 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article |
Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the intermodality and inter-rater agreement for indirect ophthalmoscopy and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging in detecting peripheral retinal lesions predisposing to retinal rhegmatogenous detachment PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, patients with a previous diagnosis of peripheral retinal lesions were enrolled. UWF pseudocolor imaging and dilated fundus examination were obtained RESULTS: Thirty-seven eyes (20 patients, 12 females) were enrolled. The level of inter-rater agreement was excellent in both the ophthalmoscopy-based and UWF-based assessment. The overall agreement in the UWF-based assessment was found to be Kappa = 0.874 (P < .0001). The UWF-based evaluation was demonstrated to have a sensitivity of 89.2% in detecting peripheral retinal lesions. In the sectorial analysis, the UWF-based reading had a lower sensitivity in the inferior sector CONCLUSION: The identification of peripheral retinal lesions with UWF imaging allowed for an accurate and reproducible assessment. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:544-549.] |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 26.06.2020 Date Revised 26.06.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20190905-02 |