Comparison of Residual Subfoveal Fluid by Intraoperative OCT After Macula-Involving RRD Repair Using Direct Drainage, Drainage Retinotomy, or Perfluoro-n-Octane
Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 50(2019), 8 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 497-503 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article Fluorocarbons perfluorooctane 6P60ZBK0QL |
| Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the residual subfoveal fluid (SFF) immediately after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair using intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed fovea-involving RRD repaired by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using different drainage techniques. iOCT images were acquired through the fovea at the start of the case prior to initiating vitrectomy and then again immediately prior to introduction of tamponade RESULTS: Ten eyes (32.3%) received perfluoro-n-octane (PFO), 12 (38.7%) underwent a posterior drainage retinotomy, and nine (29.0%) had drainage through the retinal break. There was no significant difference in the mean SFF thickness between eyes in either group (P = .85). There was no significant association between SFF thickness on iOCT and functional or anatomic outcomes (P > .05) CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the amount of residual SFF as measured on iOCT during RRD repair with pars plana vitrectomy using either direct drainage, drainage retinotomy, or PFO. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:497-503.] |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 01.01.2020 Date Revised 01.01.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
| DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20190806-04 |