On quantifying the apparent temperature sensitivity of plant phenology

© 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1984. - 225(2020), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 1033-1040
1. Verfasser: Keenan, Trevor F (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Richardson, Andrew D, Hufkens, Koen
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. autumn bud-burst ecosystem growing degree days land surface spring warming
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM300178417
003 DE-627
005 20250225191755.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.16114  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1000.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM300178417 
035 |a (NLM)31407344 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Keenan, Trevor F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On quantifying the apparent temperature sensitivity of plant phenology 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.12.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 01.12.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a Many plant phenological events are sensitive to temperature, leading to changes in the seasonal cycle of ecosystem function as the climate warms. To evaluate the current and future implications of temperature changes for plant phenology, researchers commonly use a metric of temperature sensitivity, which quantifies the change in phenology per degree change in temperature. Here, we examine the temperature sensitivity of phenology, and highlight conditions under which the widely used days-per-degree sensitivity approach is subject to methodological issues that can generate misleading results. We identify several factors, in particular the length of the period over which temperature is integrated, and changes in the statistical characteristics of the integrated temperature, that can affect the estimated apparent sensitivity to temperature. We show how the resulting artifacts can lead to spurious differences in apparent temperature sensitivity and artificial spatial gradients. Such issues are rarely considered in analyses of the temperature sensitivity of phenology. Given the issues identified, we advocate for process-oriented modelling approaches, informed by observations and with fully characterised uncertainties, as a more robust alternative to the simple days-per-degree temperature sensitivity metric. We also suggest approaches to minimise and assess spurious influences in the days-per-degree metric 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a autumn 
650 4 |a bud-burst 
650 4 |a ecosystem 
650 4 |a growing degree days 
650 4 |a land surface 
650 4 |a spring 
650 4 |a warming 
700 1 |a Richardson, Andrew D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hufkens, Koen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1984  |g 225(2020), 2 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 1033-1040  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:225  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g day:01  |g month:01  |g pages:1033-1040 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16114  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 225  |j 2020  |e 2  |b 01  |c 01  |h 1033-1040