Age-Dependent Resistance to Rhizoctonia solani in Sugar Beet

Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), caused by Rhizoctonia solani, continues to be one of the important concerns for the beet industry in Minnesota and North Dakota. Use of resistant cultivars is an important strategy in the management of R. solani in combination with see...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 103(2019), 9 vom: 10. Sept., Seite 2322-2329
1. Verfasser: Liu, Yangxi (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Qi, Aiming, Khan, Mohamed F R
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article cultivar/resistance disease management fungi sugar beet
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM299120899
003 DE-627
005 20231225095643.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-11-18-2001-RE  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0997.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM299120899 
035 |a (NLM)31298993 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Liu, Yangxi  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Age-Dependent Resistance to Rhizoctonia solani in Sugar Beet 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 24.09.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 25.09.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), caused by Rhizoctonia solani, continues to be one of the important concerns for the beet industry in Minnesota and North Dakota. Use of resistant cultivars is an important strategy in the management of R. solani in combination with seed treatment and timely fungicide application during the growing season. The objective of this greenhouse study was to determine how sugar beet plants responded to increasing age in resistance to R. solani. Each of three seed companies provided three commercial cultivars with varying R. solani resistance levels: susceptible, moderately resistant, and resistant. Seed were planted at a weekly interval to create different plant age groups from seed to 10-week-old plants, with growing degree days (GDD) ranging from 0 to 1,519 thermal time (°Cd). Seed and plants were all simultaneously inoculated with R. solani AG2-2-infested barley grains. Twenty-eight days after inoculation, plants were pulled and washed, and roots were evaluated for disease severity. All cultivars were highly susceptible to R. solani when inoculated at seed to 3 weeks old (0 to 464°Cd). At 4 and 5 weeks of plant age (617 to 766°Cd), resistant cultivars started to show significant resistance to R. solani. Proportion of the affected roots with disease score ≥ 5 followed a sigmoid response, declining with increased GDD in moderately resistant and resistant cultivars, whereas it continued to decline linearly with increased GDD in susceptible cultivars. This study demonstrated that sugar beet cultivars, regardless of their assigned level of R. solani resistance, were highly susceptible to the pathogen before they reached the six- to eight-leaf stage at 4 to 5 weeks (617 to 766°Cd) after planting. Therefore, additional protection in the form of seed treatment or fungicide application may be required to protect sensitive sugar beet seed and seedlings in fields with a history of R. solani under favorable environmental conditions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a cultivar/resistance 
650 4 |a disease management 
650 4 |a fungi 
650 4 |a sugar beet 
700 1 |a Qi, Aiming  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Khan, Mohamed F R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 103(2019), 9 vom: 10. Sept., Seite 2322-2329  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:103  |g year:2019  |g number:9  |g day:10  |g month:09  |g pages:2322-2329 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-18-2001-RE  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 103  |j 2019  |e 9  |b 10  |c 09  |h 2322-2329