Limitations of the TCLP fluid determination step for hazardous waste characterization of US municipal waste incineration ash

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (New York, N.Y.). - 1999. - 87(2019) vom: 15. März, Seite 590-596
1. Verfasser: Liu, Yalan (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Clavier, Kyle A, Spreadbury, Chad, Townsend, Timothy G
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
Schlagworte:Journal Article Ash Hazardous waste Incineration TCLP Toxicity characteristic pH Coal Ash Hazardous Waste Metals, Heavy Solid Waste
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM297280066
003 DE-627
005 20250225084517.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.045  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0990.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM297280066 
035 |a (NLM)31109559 
035 |a (PII)S0956-053X(19)30116-3 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Liu, Yalan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Limitations of the TCLP fluid determination step for hazardous waste characterization of US municipal waste incineration ash 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 12.09.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 12.09.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
520 |a The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) requires the use of one of two acid-based extraction fluids: fluid #1 or fluid #2, determined by the fluid determination step (FDS). Fluid #1 is a buffered solution of acetic acid and sodium hydroxide while fluid #2 is an unbuffered acetic acid solution. Motivated by divergent fluid determination results among different laboratories, the limitations of the FDS in the TCLP used for characterizing municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ash were investigated by varying three test parameters: solution cooling rate, degree of particle size reduction, and sub-sample selection. A faster cooling rate decreases the needed cooling time and has the potential to alter the fluid outcome to fluid #1. Excessive size reduction of particles forces all the fluid outcomes to fluid #2, possibly due to increased surface area and reaction rate of MSWI particles with the FDS media. Selecting larger particles increases the likelihood of obtaining fluid #1 while selecting smaller particles increases the possibility of requiring fluid #2, possibly due to the lower alkalinity of larger particles and higher alkalinity of smaller particles. These findings suggest that FDS can be conducted using different allowable approaches, based on the interpretation of the users who have the potential to alter the fluid outcomes to achieve a favorable extraction fluid. These limitations may allow MSWI ash to consistently "pass" the TCLP. These phenomena highlight a major flaw in the existing hazardous waste testing protocols for MSWI ash 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Ash 
650 4 |a Hazardous waste 
650 4 |a Incineration 
650 4 |a TCLP 
650 4 |a Toxicity characteristic 
650 4 |a pH 
650 7 |a Coal Ash  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Hazardous Waste  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Metals, Heavy  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Solid Waste  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Clavier, Kyle A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Spreadbury, Chad  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Townsend, Timothy G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Waste management (New York, N.Y.)  |d 1999  |g 87(2019) vom: 15. März, Seite 590-596  |w (DE-627)NLM098197061  |x 1879-2456  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:87  |g year:2019  |g day:15  |g month:03  |g pages:590-596 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.045  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 87  |j 2019  |b 15  |c 03  |h 590-596