Compliance with and ecosystem function of biodiversity offsets in North American and European freshwaters

© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 34(2020), 1 vom: 20. Feb., Seite 41-53
1. Verfasser: Theis, Sebastian (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Ruppert, Jonathan L W, Roberts, Karling N, Minns, Charles K, Koops, Marten, Poesch, Mark S
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review arroyo compensación compensation conservación conservation desarrollo development mehr... evaluación evaluation humedal lago lake management manejo mitigación mitigation river río stream wetland
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.
Land-use change via human development is a major driver of biodiversity loss. To reduce these impacts, billions of dollars are spent on biodiversity offsets. However, studies evaluating offset project effectiveness that examine components such as the overall compliance and function of projects remain rare. We reviewed 577 offsetting projects in freshwater ecosystems that included the metrics project size, type of aquatic system (e.g., wetland and creek), offsetting measure (e.g., enhancement, restoration, and creation), and an assessment of the projects' compliance and functional success. Project information was obtained from scientific and government databases and gray literature. Despite considerable investment in offsetting projects, crucial problems persisted. Although compliance and function were related to each other, a high level of compliance did not guarantee a high degree of function. However, large projects relative to area had better function than small projects. Function improved when projects targeted productivity or specific ecosystem features and when multiple complementary management targets were in place. Restorative measures were more likely to achieve targets than creating entirely new ecosystems. Altogether the relationships we found highlight specific ecological processes that may help improve offsetting outcomes
Beschreibung:Date Completed 21.07.2020
Date Revised 21.07.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13343