Network analysis of a stakeholder community combatting illegal wildlife trade

© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 33(2019), 6 vom: 30. Dez., Seite 1307-1317
1. Verfasser: Moshier, Andrea (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Steadman, Janna, Roberts, David L
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article NGO ONG academic académicos análisis de redes sociales aplicación centralidad de redes community comunidad mehr... enforcement network centrality social network analysis
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM296273147
003 DE-627
005 20231225085459.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13336  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0987.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM296273147 
035 |a (NLM)31006914 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Moshier, Andrea  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Network analysis of a stakeholder community combatting illegal wildlife trade 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 11.12.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 08.01.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a The illegal wildlife trade has emerged as a growing and urgent environmental issue. Stakeholders involved in the efforts to curb wildlife trafficking include nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academia, and state government and enforcement bodies. The extent to which these stakeholders work and communicate among each other is fundamental to effectively combatting illicit trade. Using the United Kingdom as a case study, we used a social network analysis and semistructured interviews of stakeholders to assess communication relationships in the counter wildlife trafficking community. The NGOs consistently occupied 4 of the 5 most central positions in the generated networks, whereas academic institutions routinely occupied 4 of the 5 most peripheral positions. However, NGOs were the least diverse in their communication practices compared with the other stakeholder groups. Stakeholders identified personal relationships as the most important aspect of functioning communication. Participant insights also showed that stakeholder-specific variables (e.g., ethical and confidentiality concerns), competition, and fundraising can have a confounding effect on intercommunication. Evaluating communication networks and intrastakeholder communication trends is essential to creating cohesive, productive, and efficient responses to the challenges of combatting illegal wildlife trade. Article impact statement: Communication among those combatting illegal wildlife trade is confounded by stakeholder variables (ethics, confidentiality), competition, and fundraising 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a NGO 
650 4 |a ONG 
650 4 |a academic 
650 4 |a académicos 
650 4 |a análisis de redes sociales 
650 4 |a aplicación 
650 4 |a centralidad de redes 
650 4 |a community 
650 4 |a comunidad 
650 4 |a enforcement 
650 4 |a network centrality 
650 4 |a social network analysis 
700 1 |a Steadman, Janna  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roberts, David L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 33(2019), 6 vom: 30. Dez., Seite 1307-1317  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:6  |g day:30  |g month:12  |g pages:1307-1317 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13336  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 6  |b 30  |c 12  |h 1307-1317