We need both natural and energy solutions to stabilize our climate

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology. - 1999. - 25(2019), 6 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 1889-1890
1. Verfasser: Griscom, Bronson W (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Lomax, Guy, Kroeger, Timm, Fargione, Joseph E, Adams, Justin, Almond, Lucy, Bossio, Deborah, Cook-Patton, Susan C, Ellis, Peter W, Kennedy, Christina M, Kiesecker, Joseph
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Global change biology
Schlagworte:Letter Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Comment climate change fossil fuel emissions land use natural climate solutions terrestrial ecosystems Carbon Dioxide 142M471B3J
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
We respond to concerns raised by Baldocchi and Penuelas who question the potential for ecosystems to provide carbon sinks and storage, and conclude that we should focus on decarbonizing our energy systems. While we agree with many of their concerns, we arrive at a different conclusion: we need strong action to advance both clean energy solutions and natural climate solutions (NCS) if we are to stabilize warming well below 2°C. Cost-effective NCS can deliver 11.3 PgCO2 e yr-1 or ~30% of near-term climate mitigation needs through protection, improved management, and restoration of ecosystems, as we increase overall ambition
Beschreibung:Date Completed 13.05.2019
Date Revised 13.10.2023
published: Print-Electronic
CommentOn: Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Apr;25(4):1191-1197. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14559. - PMID 30588763
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.14612