We need both natural and energy solutions to stabilize our climate
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology. - 1999. - 25(2019), 6 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 1889-1890 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Global change biology |
Schlagworte: | Letter Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Comment climate change fossil fuel emissions land use natural climate solutions terrestrial ecosystems Carbon Dioxide 142M471B3J |
Zusammenfassung: | © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. We respond to concerns raised by Baldocchi and Penuelas who question the potential for ecosystems to provide carbon sinks and storage, and conclude that we should focus on decarbonizing our energy systems. While we agree with many of their concerns, we arrive at a different conclusion: we need strong action to advance both clean energy solutions and natural climate solutions (NCS) if we are to stabilize warming well below 2°C. Cost-effective NCS can deliver 11.3 PgCO2 e yr-1 or ~30% of near-term climate mitigation needs through protection, improved management, and restoration of ecosystems, as we increase overall ambition |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 13.05.2019 Date Revised 13.10.2023 published: Print-Electronic CommentOn: Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Apr;25(4):1191-1197. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14559. - PMID 30588763 Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1365-2486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/gcb.14612 |