Bird conservation and the land sharing-sparing continuum in farmland-dominated landscapes of lowland England

© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 33(2019), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1045-1055
1. Verfasser: Finch, Tom (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Gillings, Simon, Green, Rhys E, Massimino, Dario, Peach, Will J, Balmford, Andrew
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't agricultura agricultura amigable con la fauna agriculture aves de clima templado conservación conservation dosificación de suelo land sharing mehr... land sparing partición de suelo temperate birds wildlife-friendly farming 农业, 保护, 土地分离, 土地共享, 野生动物友好型农业, 温带鸟类
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM295228873
003 DE-627
005 20231225083213.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13316  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0984.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM295228873 
035 |a (NLM)30900280 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Finch, Tom  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Bird conservation and the land sharing-sparing continuum in farmland-dominated landscapes of lowland England 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 11.12.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 08.01.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Empirical evidence from many regions suggests that most species would be least negatively affected if human food demand were met through high-yield agricultural production and conservation of nonfarm ecosystems (land sparing), rather than through wildlife-friendly farming over a larger area (land sharing). However, repeated glaciation and a long history of agriculture may lead to different results in regions such as western Europe. We compared the consequences of land sparing and land sharing on breeding bird species in 2 lowland regions of England, The Fens, with 101 species, and Salisbury Plain, with 83. We derived density-yield responses for each species and then estimated regional population size under regional food production strategies, including land sharing and land sparing, a range of intermediate strategies, and a novel mixed strategy. In both regions, more species achieved maximum regional population size under land sparing than land sharing. In The Fens, the majority of birds were loser species (estimated to have smaller populations under all food production strategies than in the preagricultural baseline scenario), whereas in Salisbury Plain the majority were winners (smaller populations in the preagricultural baseline scenario). Loser species overwhelmingly achieved maximum regional population size under land sparing, whereas winner species achieved maximum regional population size under either land sharing or an intermediate strategy, highlighting the importance of defining which groups of species are the target of conservation. A novel 3-compartment strategy (combining high-yield farming, natural habitat, and low-yield farming) often performed better than either land sharing or land sparing. Our results support intermediate or 3-compartment land-sparing strategies to maximize bird populations across lowland agricultural landscapes. To deliver conservation outcomes, any shift toward land sparing must, however, ensure yield increases are sustainable in the long term, do not entail increased negative effects on surrounding areas, and are linked to allocation of land for nature 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a agricultura 
650 4 |a agricultura amigable con la fauna 
650 4 |a agriculture 
650 4 |a aves de clima templado 
650 4 |a conservación 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a dosificación de suelo 
650 4 |a land sharing 
650 4 |a land sparing 
650 4 |a partición de suelo 
650 4 |a temperate birds 
650 4 |a wildlife-friendly farming 
650 4 |a 农业, 保护, 土地分离, 土地共享, 野生动物友好型农业, 温带鸟类 
700 1 |a Gillings, Simon  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Green, Rhys E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Massimino, Dario  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Peach, Will J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Balmford, Andrew  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 33(2019), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1045-1055  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:5  |g day:15  |g month:10  |g pages:1045-1055 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13316  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 5  |b 15  |c 10  |h 1045-1055