First Report of Phytoplasmas in Soybean, Alfalfa, and Lupinus sp. in Lithuania

Plants of cultivated soybean (Glycine max) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in Dotnuva and of wild Lupinus sp. in Ledakalnis, Lithuania, exhibited symptoms that suggested phytoplasmal infections. Soybean plants were of normal growth habit but exhibited veinal necrosis. Alfalfa and Lupinus plants exhibi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 84(2000), 2 vom: 30. Feb., Seite 198
1. Verfasser: Jomantiene, R (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Davis, R E, Antoniuk, L, Staniulis, J
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2000
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM294653325
003 DE-627
005 20231225081943.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.198C  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0982.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM294653325 
035 |a (NLM)30841317 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Jomantiene, R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a First Report of Phytoplasmas in Soybean, Alfalfa, and Lupinus sp. in Lithuania 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a Plants of cultivated soybean (Glycine max) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in Dotnuva and of wild Lupinus sp. in Ledakalnis, Lithuania, exhibited symptoms that suggested phytoplasmal infections. Soybean plants were of normal growth habit but exhibited veinal necrosis. Alfalfa and Lupinus plants exhibited stunting, abnormally small leaves, and witches'-broom symptoms. Diseases in the plants were termed soybean veinal necrosis (SVN), alfalfa stunt (AlfS), and Lupinus stunt (LupS), respectively. The presence of phytoplasmas in diseased plants was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for amplification of phytoplasma-specific 16S rDNA. A phytoplasma-characteristic 1.2-kbp DNA fragment was amplified from all diseased plants but not from known healthy plants in nested PCRs in which the first DNA amplification was primed by primer pair P1/P7 and reamplification of DNA was primed by primer pair F2n/R2 (2,4). Products from the nested PCR primed by F2n/R2 were subjected to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and the RFLP patterns obtained were compared with patterns previously published (1-4). On the basis of AluI, HaeIII, HhaI, HpaI, KpnI, MseI, and RsaI RFLP patterns, the SVN and LupS phytoplasmas were classified in group 16SrIII (peach X-disease phytoplasma group), subgroup B (III-B, type strain clover yellow edge phytoplasma), and the AlfS phytoplasma was classified in group 16SrI (aster yellows phytoplasma group), subgroup B (I-B, type strain aster yellows phytoplasma). Nucleotide sequences were determined for 16S rDNA fragments amplified from SVN and AlfS phytoplasmas in nested PCRs primed by F2n/R2. The sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession nos. AF177383 for SVN and AF177384 for AlfS. Sequence similarity between the 16S rDNAs of SVN and Canadian clover yellow edge (strain CYE-C, GenBank Accession no. AF175304) phytoplasmas was 99.8%; sequence similarity between 16S rDNAs of AlfS and aster yellows (strain SAY, GenBank Accession no. M86340) phytoplasmas was 99.6%. The SVN phytoplasma 16S rDNA shared 100% sequence similarity with a 16S rDNA from the Lithuanian clover yellow edge (CYE-L, GenBank Accession no. AF173558) phytoplasma. The nucleotide sequence data supported the conclusion that the SVN and AlfS phytoplasmas were closely related to strains classified in subgroups III-B and I-B, respectively. Our findings extend the known geographic ranges of phytoplasma subgroups I-B and III-B to northern Europe, including Lithuania, and expand the known plant host ranges of these pathogens. References: (1) R. E. Davis et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:262, 1997. (2) R. Jomantiene et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:269, 1998. (3) R. Jomantiene et al. HortScience 33:1069, 1998. (4) I.-M. Lee et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1153, 1998 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Davis, R E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Antoniuk, L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Staniulis, J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 84(2000), 2 vom: 30. Feb., Seite 198  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:84  |g year:2000  |g number:2  |g day:30  |g month:02  |g pages:198 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.198C  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 84  |j 2000  |e 2  |b 30  |c 02  |h 198