First Report of Pink Seed of Pea Caused by Erwinia rhapontici in North Dakota

In 2006, a seed lot of dry pea cv. DS Admiral obtained from Bowman County, North Dakota contained seed with bright-to-pale pink discoloration on the seed coat. Five discolored seeds and five seeds with normal appearance were surface disinfected in a 0.5% NaOCl solution for 1 min and rinsed with ster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 92(2008), 2 vom: 11. Feb., Seite 315
1. Verfasser: Wise, K A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Zhao, Y F, Bradley, C A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM293948186
003 DE-627
005 20231225080427.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0315A  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0979.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM293948186 
035 |a (NLM)30769398 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Wise, K A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a First Report of Pink Seed of Pea Caused by Erwinia rhapontici in North Dakota 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a In 2006, a seed lot of dry pea cv. DS Admiral obtained from Bowman County, North Dakota contained seed with bright-to-pale pink discoloration on the seed coat. Five discolored seeds and five seeds with normal appearance were surface disinfected in a 0.5% NaOCl solution for 1 min and rinsed with sterilized distilled water for 1 min. Seeds were placed onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 22°C. Three days later, the discolored seeds produced pink bacterial colonies and a pink pigment that diffused throughout the PDA. The pink bacterial colonies were tentatively identified as Erwinia rhapontici on the basis of colony and pigment color (2,3). No fungi or bacteria grew from the seed with normal appearance. A pink bacterial colony growing from one of the discolored seeds was streaked onto PDA and a single colony was obtained. A streaked plate incubated at 37°C showed no growth, which distinguishes E. rhapontici from Brenneria rubrifaciens (formerly E. rubrifaciens) (1-3). To confirm the identity, the isolate was sent to the Bacterial Identification and Fatty Acid Analysis Laboratory at the University of Florida, Gainesville. Fatty acid analysis indicated a similarity index of 0.515 for E. rhapontici. For an additional confirmation of identity, the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene was amplified from the E. rhapontici isolate with universal primers fD1 and rP1 (4). The PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced with primers SP6 and T7 at the Keck Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois, Urbana. The resulting nucleotide sequence was compared with 16S rDNA sequences deposited in the ribosomal database ( http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/seqmatch/seqmatch_intro.jsp ) and showed highest identity to sequences of E. rhapontici or E. persicinus strains. To confirm pathogenicity, the basal ends of five pods on each of six pea plants (cv. Carneval) were syringe injected with 0.1 ml of suspension containing the obtained E. rhapontici isolate in the greenhouse by the methods as previously described (2). As a control, five pods on each of two plants were injected with 0.1 ml of sterile distilled water. Twenty-eight of the 51 seeds obtained from the bacteria-inoculated pods had pink seed symptoms, while seeds from the control pods appeared normal. Isolations from symptomatic and asymptomatic seed were performed as described above, and E. rhapontici was obtained from symptomatic seed. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pink seed of pea caused by E. rhapontici in North Dakota. The first report of this disease on pea in the United States was from Montana (3). References: (1) L. Hauben et al. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21:384, 1998. (2) H. C. Huang et al. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 12:445, 1990. (3) B. K. Schroeder et al. Plant Dis. 86:188, 2002. (4) W. G. Weisburg et al. J. Bacteriol. 173:697, 1991 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Zhao, Y F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bradley, C A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 92(2008), 2 vom: 11. Feb., Seite 315  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:92  |g year:2008  |g number:2  |g day:11  |g month:02  |g pages:315 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0315A  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 92  |j 2008  |e 2  |b 11  |c 02  |h 315